The last hour, shows Kamala Harris has improved upon Joe Bidens numbers. In a aa ballot, 49 of respondents said they would vote for harris and her running mate Tim Walz compared to 44 for donald Trump And J. D. Vance. While those results should give democrats some comfort that Harris Campaign has been effective, those numbers are still within the margin of error and that is important to always recognize when looking at polls. With thousands of early votes cast, and many more Absentee Ballots arriving in mailboxes in the coming days, both campaigns are taking a more aggressive stance in these final weeks of the race. Following her wellreceived Debate Performance just 12 days ago, Kamala Harris is seeking to do it again and face trump at least one more time. Her campaign announced yesterday the democratic nominee accepted a proposed Cnn Debate scheduled for october 23rd, less than two weeks before election day. Now that is basically a dare for Donald Trump, whos insisted that actually he
Washington for the at National Action network is hosting this rally followed by a margin commemoration, the march is called get your knees off my neck, in response to the death of george floyd in minneapolis. Serving as a contributor to , from 1 00pton show to 4 00 monday through friday. Because of her dedication to the activism, and lifetime outside of her career, in 2016 the president barack obama Lifetime Achievement order. At welcome marco host, please welcome our cohost, ebony. Ebony thank you. Before i begin i want to quote some of the words from the late john lewis that he said in 1963. He said my friends, let us not forget that we are involved in a serious social revolution, by and large american politics are dominated by politicians who build their careers on immoral compromises and ally themselves economic, and, social expectation. I will ask the same question that he asked, where is the Political Party that will make it unnecessary us to keep having to march on washington .
Moment and explain the balance this amendment achieves. Encryption technologies are critical tools for protecting privacy and the individuals personal information. At the same time, Law Enforcement and intelligence professionals need access to information to keep our country safe. As well as a parent the apple versus the fbi case, encryption, in that case of a device addressed, and in the context of data in motion, can be an impediment to Law Enforcement obtaining the information it needs. And we recognize this is a difficult balance, in the middle of a conversation were having among ourselves, including in this room. And we believe, as this amendment suggests, the best way forward is through a commission on Digital Security that brings together Law Enforcement, security personnel, experts in technology from silicon valley, to weigh the best way forward. This commission would propose solutions that both protect very important individual private also givingwhile Law Enforcement and inte
That is the spirit that i want to build on. Its one of the reasons why, next week, using the task force that we have set up after ferguson, but also building on andnd inviting both Police Law Enforcement and community activists, civil rights leaders, bringing them together to the white house, i want to start moving on constructive actions that are actually going to make it difference. Because that is what all americans want. So, when we start suggesting that somehow theres this enormous polarization, and we are back to the situation in the 1960s, thats just not true. You are not seeing riots. Police goingeeing after people who are protesting peacefully. You have seen almost uniformly peaceful protests, and you have handlingormly, police those protests with professionalism. So, as tough, hard, as depressing as the loss of life was this week, we have a foundation to build on. Confidencee to have that we can build on those better angels of our nature. Thate have to make sure all of us ste
American technology, and millions of American Workers to do it with. Now, what do the republicans propose . Basically, their Energy Program has two parts. The first part is to get rid of almost everything that weve done for the American Public in the last 3 years. They want to reduce or abolish the Synthetic Fuels program. They want to slash the solar energy incentives, the conservation programs, aid to mass transit, aid to elderly americans to help pay their fuel bills. They want to eliminate the 55 mile speed limit. And while they are at it, the republicans would like to gut the clean air act. They never liked it to begin with. Thats one part of their program; the other part is worse. To replace what we have built, this is what they propose to destroy the windfall profits tax and to unleash the Oil Companies and let them solve the Energy Problem for us. Thats it. That is it. Thats their whole program. There is no more. Can this nation accept such an outrageous program . No we democra