marianne rafferty is life with breaking information from a target insider. >> fox news digital is reportin some target employees are being told to move there lgbt cute pride displays to less prominen locations in the story to avoid customer backlash fraid so managers and district senior directors were on emergency calls on friday where they were told also that they could not have anything on manikins and n learned signage promoting those products read most of the locations affected our in rural southern stores according to that report. this comes just weeks after the company bud light came under fire for partnering with transgender influencer. sales plummeted 28.4 percent in the week ending may 13th alone pride in an interview last week target ceo brian cornell told fortunes leadership now podcast by promoting the lgbt cute friendly products is the right thing for society and a great thing for their brand. this year's target pride
in think real woman can do this instead of the manikins we suffering from chronic pain at the age of 13. >> this is obviously in absurd hypothesis. people that volunteer for a medical studies that there is afflicted sebo group and a non- placebo group. i don't want. >> in trouble. kennedy, isn't this amazing tha this story could exist independently while they put down title ix? >> it's the best thing i've eve seen. number one if title ix mcbain away, i'm fine with it because ucla will once again have a men's gymnastics team and men's swim team. you don't have that because of
he get the dummies are taking the jump job jobs of the human spirit you hit the nail on the head. >> i was onto point that out pretty guy don't know why you'r selling razors. you ever thought about this before? it makes sense in a way the bod differences, but it's not gende inequity the way they define it. >> i do love the fact that they love going nuts and the liberal politicians have tried their level best to erase real women, but we artest our test feeders and birthing people, but now that we tried to revive on, the do it as inanimate manikins tha have no genitals and no reproductive organs.
an hour and then it opens up 11 parachutes in a different sequence to splash down in the pacific ocean. a lot that needs to go right with this, there are no people on board, so it's not quite as risky as if you have astronauts inside, but they want to show that this spacecraft works and it has been a success. if works and it has been a success. if it is a success, is it then straight forward process ofjust doing the same thing but crude, or is there another step quite like what happens next? , , ., ., , , ., ., next? they will be analysing all of this data from _ next? they will be analysing all of this data from the _ next? they will be analysing all of this data from the 26 _ next? they will be analysing all of this data from the 26 day - next? they will be analysing all of| this data from the 26 day mission, there are also two things they want to assess, they have manikins inside the capsule, they are assessing how much radiation the manikins were hit by, the vibrations coming through the earth's atmosphere. the plan is, for the next step, to get astronauts on board. the next artemis mission will see astronaut going into orbit around the moon and then the third artemis mission will actually see astronauts landing on the moon. first time in 50 years. in a perfect
because there's no people on board. there's only three manikins on board. the next mission, artemis 2, will have four people, three nasa astronauts and one canadian _ but that can only happen if this mission goes perfectly. so the primary objective, beyond launching the rocket, is to orbit around the moon, but bring the orion capsule back to earth. it's going to hit the earth at 25,000 miles an hour, and then it'll descend through the atmosphere, slow down on three parachutes and land safely in the pacific ocean off the coast of california. and they want to recover that capsule and see how it did. and that is the primary objective, recover this capsule so we can send astronauts next time in _ about two years so 2024. well, you mentioned two years. you also mentioned 25,000 miles an hour. that's going to be a bit ofa bumpy landing. what is it we hope to get out
the whole idea is to test out everything that it can and should do in advance of people, and the next flight will have people on board.— and the next flight will have people on board. if the next fliuht is people on board. if the next flight is meant _ people on board. if the next flight is meant to _ people on board. if the next flight is meant to have - people on board. if the next i flight is meant to have people on board, what's the ambition here for people in the future? when i grew up, i watched the last apollo landings in high school, and we went to the moon for geopolitical reasons. now, as we go back, although this is an american mission, the piece of hardware was built by europe and it has manikins in research from others countries on board. this took place people on the moon and will be an international effort. it's part of a larger thing. there is something called the artemis accords, which has a star trek ring to it on purpose, where 21 countries have all come
into day, literally. it was so bright, it overwhelmed all our cameras. but it's got our dreams going back to the moon and that is really important for the future. well, you mentioned the future. tell us more about what this means for future space travel, why this is so important. well, this mission has to succeed. the rocket has to succeed, and orion has to succeed because there's no people on board. there's only three manikins on board. the next mission, artemis 2, will have four people, three nasa astronauts and one canadian. but that can only happen if this mission goes perfectly. so the primary objective, beyond launching the rocket, is to orbit around the moon, but bring the orion capsule back to earth. it's going to hit the earth at 25,000 miles an hour, and then it'll descend through the atmosphere, slow down on three parachutes and land safely in the pacific ocean off the coast of california. and they want to recover that capsule and see how it did. and that is the primary
it's got manikins and research from dozens of countries on board. so, when this... it's part of a larger thing. there's something called the artemis accords, which has a star trek ring to it on purpose. 21 countries have all come together to work on this. the idea is we've done this before, but for about two thirds of humanity, who weren't even alive, they haven't seen anyone work on another world. for them, this will be the first moon programme. i don't want to be a damper, but i have to ask and i'm sure many might be wondering as well — there are so many problems on earth. is this really where humanity's efforts are best place? really where humanity's efforts are best lace? ., really where humanity's efforts are best place?— really where humanity's efforts are best lace? ., ., ., ., best place? you can ask that, and it has been put to space people for half a century or longer. but india, a country that has a lot of economic issues, is racing to send probes to