temporarily? yes, please. let s not presume there s agreement. sorry, even though we discussed it. miss tidwell? discussion? i m sorry. two points i believe it would be in range, it would be 4.97. you said discussion? yes. that s not a question though. we can we look at the layer of sequences defined? what does that have to do with this question? got it. there s no public submission for the boundry but we can look at the planning neighborhoods. this is the planning neighborhoods of sea cliff. would you like to also see, it also goes and extend out. any other questions? all right. miss tidwell? yes. mr. schreiber? yes. mr. pilpel? yes. miss mondejar? yes. miss lam? yes. miss ma melara? yes. mr. league? yes. mr. leeg leigh. yes. no. i will look at the deviations. thank you. can i make a comment while at the look at the numbers? sure. i think the pop lore initially had either ben the four blocks between two and five
i also wanted to thank the consultants and kay for all their work in getting the draft maps and the boundaries up on the website so quickly. and lastly i would like to thank any fellow council members who came to testify so passionately but respectfully for their neighborhoods in district 11. so far we have only lost population in those areas we all agreed to sacrifice to keep district 11 whole. it is an honor to serve with them on the council and to have them as friends. thank you, and one last please, don t make any further changes to district 11. thank you, ma am. yes, mrs. brown? hi, my name is marzel brown and i work with central city collaborative. and today i m here on the behalf of the bristol hotel. which is located on 56 mason. mike nolty has showed you the little map area of where we want to stay. it is very, very small as you can see this little section right here. that s what we need to keep in district six. so if you guys will help us out, and remap that, it
to district 11. thank you, ma am. yes, mrs. brown? hi, my name is marzel brown and i work with central city collaborative. and today i m here on the behalf of the bristol hotel. which is located on 56 mason. mike nolty has showed you the little map area of where we want to stay. it is very, very small as you can see this little section right here. that s what we need to keep in district six. so if you guys will help us out, and remap that, it will be a great deal to us and the tenants in the bristol hotel that we deal with on a daily basis. thank you again for your time and your preparations and you guys do a wonderful job. keep up the good work. thank you. following mrs. scott will be shelby, lisa shin, pierre and natalie brown. good morning task force. my name is lois scott, and i live by cathedral, i live on cathedral hill by st. mary s cathedral about two and a half blocks from the proposed hospital site. i m on the board of the cathedral hill neighbors who were
there s no public submission for the boundry but we can look at the planning neighborhoods. this is the planning neighborhoods of sea cliff. would you like to also see, it also goes and extend out. any other questions? all right. miss tidwell? yes. mr. schreiber? yes. mr. pilpel? yes. miss mondejar? yes. miss lam? yes. miss ma melara? yes. mr. league? yes. mr. leeg leigh. yes. no. i will look at the deviations. thank you. can i make a comment while at the look at the numbers? sure. i think the pop lore initially had either ben the four blocks between two and five as a way to clean the lines. so since those are not submitted as part of a neighborhood, i would suggest we look there to the extent we still have a population issue. ok. mr. chair, we have the deviation. it is negative 4.997%. are you comfortable? i m comfortable. thank you. thanks for that exercise. let s visit now the less again attempting to move fairly swiftl
easy trade off. thank you. and nothing other than what has already been raised. thank you. with the last one you mentioned, the 15th street to extend to valencia that was mentioned. it was not the last one. the last one we mentioned was no, that is correct. we did capture it. ok, thank you. i thought that was a repeat. because it is already at the freeway. and we have been dealing with that extension for a long time. ok, thank you. i had three items, but then i had a recall. i wanted to consider that three- way trade. if there is any interest in that, that was one to revisit. it is a revisit. understood. the second is the ucsf block we heard about today. i did not think that was on the list. we just made that move at the last meeting. right no, we did not. we considered that move and did not reverse it. raising it again? if we heard some further public comment on that today. it was not a different case, though. understood. so what is the