qualified given his history on that alone? >> because of the factors are security-related, is the bipartisan group of members ever committed to me that security be declined, it is ultimately my decision but i have all of the recommendation each time. >> neil: i am no brainiac when it comes to these matters but robert f. kennedy junior, given your family history, given your dad's killing 56 years ago today, of course he witnessed the same with your uncle john f. kennedy when you were nine years old i believe you were 14 at the time of your dad's assassination but no secret service protection. it was ruled that way and it continues to be rules that way. >> yeah,, i was with my dad when he died, in los angeles in 1968 like you said neil, i was 14 years old at the time, that
and this is particularly egregious. rishi sunak has crossed whatever line was left to be crossed, and i hope my former boss and former cabinet secretary gus o'donnell said whoever is in charge of the next government, the treasury should simply say no, we cannot do this, we will not allow civil servants to be abused in that way. that is something that both parties have done and misused in the past, i thought what happened last night was particularly bad, but hopefully this is the last time. i particularly bad, but hopefully this is the last time.— is the last time. i picture emily thornberry _ is the last time. i picture emily thornberry about _ is the last time. i picture emily thornberry about whether - is the last time. i picture emily thornberry about whether all l is the last time. i picture emily| thornberry about whether all of is the last time. i picture emily - thornberry about whether all of this matters, because what the conservatives did successfully was planted the seed in the minds of voters that labour is a party that would raise taxes, and labour are clearly refuting those allegations today. the conservatives say they stand by those numbers. what it has done is plant that seed, and whether accurate or not, straightaway it has
wondering what took the administration so long to move on to these executive orders, they don't flip over some of these ideas they have, many saying too little too late. a hundred markers when i spoke to him yesterday said there are reasons for that. >> weeks later congress to act, they did not act once, they recently failed to act twice and we took this executive action. it is not too little or too late, we hope that congress would act, they failed to do so and the president exercised his executive authority as he has done now. >> neil: with us now, the speaker of the house to answer all of that, mike johnston kind enough to join us out of washington. >> hello neil, great to be with you. >> neil: what did you think about of the secretary saying this is on you and the federal -- end of the republicans, making it look like a sure thing, saint donald trump stopped you tag this is why the president had to step in and take matters into his own hands? >> or what i say as this is
the lessons is — away. with thoughts on today? while the lessons is that _ away. with thoughts on today? while the lessons is that germans - away. with thoughts on today? while the lessons is that germans had - the lessons is that germans had advanced — the lessons is that germans had advanced weapons— the lessons is that germans had advanced weapons but - the lessons is that germans had advanced weapons but we - the lessons is that germans had advanced weapons but we had l the lessons is that germans had advanced weapons but we had aj the lessons is that germans had i advanced weapons but we had a lot the lessons is that germans had - advanced weapons but we had a lot of tanks _ advanced weapons but we had a lot of tanks and _ advanced weapons but we had a lot of tanks and that — advanced weapons but we had a lot of tanks and that matters _ advanced weapons but we had a lot of tanks and that matters for— advanced weapons but we had a lot of tanks and that matters for ukraine - tanks and that matters for ukraine and the _ tanks and that matters for ukraine and the second _ tanks and that matters for ukraine and the second thing _ tanks and that matters for ukraine and the second thing is— tanks and that matters for ukraine and the second thing is i'm - tanks and that matters for ukraine and the second thing is i'm 25, i. and the second thing is i'm 25, i did not— and the second thing is i'm 25, i did not know— and the second thing is i'm 25, i did not know as _ and the second thing is i'm 25, i did not know as much— and the second thing is i'm 25, i did not know as much about - and the second thing is i'm 25, i did not know as much about dd| and the second thing is i'm 25, i. did not know as much about dd as it should _ did not know as much about dd as it should have — did not know as much about dd as it should have until— did not know as much about dd as it should have until very— did not know as much about dd as it should have until very recently - did not know as much about dd as it should have until very recently and i should have until very recently and ithink— should have until very recently and i think we — should have until very recently and i think we should _ should have until very recently and i think we should teach _ should have until very recently and i think we should teach a _ should have until very recently and i think we should teach a lot - should have until very recently and i think we should teach a lot morel i think we should teach a lot more about— i think we should teach a lot more about the — i think we should teach a lot more about the bolsheviks _ i think we should teach a lot more about the bolsheviks and - i think we should teach a lot more about the bolsheviks and a - i think we should teach a lot more about the bolsheviks and a lot - i think we should teach a lot more . about the bolsheviks and a lot more about _ about the bolsheviks and a lot more about dd _ about the bolsheviks and a lot more about dd and — about the bolsheviks and a lot more about dd and her— about the bolsheviks and a lot more about dd and her veterans - about d—day and our veterans. an update on the french open. the quarterfinals of the men's singles in the tournament is certainly delivering on upsets, another to topsy throughout in a shock defeat for the world number one.
"the new york times" story reports people in the room, federal society members like don mcgahn, who also testified about various aspects of this. so, that's a lie. how people hear about this matters. do people, as we go from this inflection point of conviction on to a debate in a couple of weeks and trump sentencing and a lot of other stuff -- this is what the summer is going to be partly like. do people hear these legal facts and know trump's past efforts to abuse power, the recent documented history? or do they hear him just selling all this as the new response and, sort of, think, well, that's true or that's kind of true or they see headlines about payback in "the new york times" and think, here we go again, both sides? maga curious voters might want to hear it that way or minimize it. and not everyone who might ever vote red, republican, or trump, is signed on to all the conspiracy theories. a lot of people, believe it or not, are still moved by facts. that's precisely why donald trump hoped people would wrongly think there was a fact about certain opponents being
necessarily mean it was sufficient to alter how you might vote. ijust thought, you know, just to throw that into the mix around it. but yeah, i think you're right, alex, in the round, did anyone. ..? it's always hard, this sort of, who won, isn't it? what is victory? but i think where given where rishi sunak was, as we reflected last night, where rishi sunak was psychologically and with his own party, he came out looking like he had plenty of fight in him. and i think that matters, even if only for morale on his side and nothing else. i think maybe the more relevant question in the debates to come and of course, last night's is maybe not who won in the voter comments, but did anyone really lose? ie, is this sort ofjeopardy and danger of a huge mistake greater than maybe a sort of narrow edge of victory in this campaign? because that actually might end up going on to have much more consequence.
why this happened. >> no collusion, no conspiracy, no obstruction. it is official, everybody. >> bob mueller did not find chargeable collusion. >> miss collins, not guilty. mr. mcconnell, not guilty. >> the president acquitted of abusing power and obstructing congress. >> donald trump tonight declared not guilty of the impeachment charge he inrited insurrection at the capitol. >> the u.s. supreme court handing donald trump the gift of time. >> after months of delays and closed door hearings, the classified documents case against former president donald trump has been officially and indefinitely delaid. >> i did my job. we did our job. many voices out there, the only voice that matters is the voice of the jury, and the jury has spoken. >> facts. and this one was different. and the alliances he had, the political relationships he developed, the supreme court,
>> yeah. no it's terrible. look, again there's legitimate place for good faith debate and criticism of judicial rulings and arguments made by the defense or the prosecution. look, people on the left i think legitimately i'm one of them. in my podcast and elsewhere, criticized legitimacy of the supreme court. and talk about whether or not sam alito or justice clarence thomas should recuse themselves from certain matters. that's good and respectful debate. you can have that argument, the board of appeals will have the final word of that. but attacking jurors in our system i think it's a bridge too far. as you pointed out, a prosecutor would have said. i said on a number of occasions we win every case we brought. alvin bragg would have taken in stride an acquittal in this case. i think the good and rational thing to have done was you know you can fight in the court of appeal, you can say you disagree with the jurors decision. but we have created a climate.
conservative stripes on display over his lifelong career. but, but that's not where we're at right now. this is all about one person will eventually wake up. my hope is that folks walk into the polling station, not as republican, but as an american in november. and do the right thing. >> well, we'll see how this all pans out because of course, i mean, the amount of mine has been raised and may till now. i think hundred and 41 million according to the rnc since may alone, 70 million raised 48 hours after trump verdict and questions being raised, but whether to support somebody who frankly, if he were to win, could potentially shift the balance of power in the senate. there's a lot to unpack. geoff duncan, thanks for joining absolutely well, president biden is about to make a big shift and take matters into his own hands on border policy they whereas he have the power to do so. and we'll let upset people in his own party. the debate is next. but first, a moment to
powering progress juneteenth celebrating freedom and legacy wednesday, june 19, they ten on cnn well for months, president biden has urged congress to curb the flow of migrant crossings i'm calling on congress to pass his bill. >> gets my desk immediately. my republican bryozoa to the american people get this bill done, we need to act now i'll newest flash, congress did not act despite a bipartisan effort in the senate cut to as early as tomorrow president biden is paying to take matters into his own hands at the power of the pen. >> the news that give order is expected to be the most aggressive immigration policy put in place by his administration allowing officials to shut down the southern border when crossings or surge. >> but is it too little too late? >> are willing even work? joining us now, former republican congressman joe walsh and cnn football commentator and former at&t