call to georgia s election officials in which trump demanded they find trump demanded they a very find a very specific number of votes. specific number of votes. watch. watch. all i want to do is this. i just want to find 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have. that number would have been enough to declare trump the winner of georgia. two men on the other end of that phone call are expected to testify the fourth year in georgia secretary of state, brad raffensperger, and the top deputy, gabriel sterling, both men receiving death threats after being publicly attacked by trump and his allies. here s gabriel sterling in december 2020 speaking directly to donald trump. big stop inspiring people to big due acts of violence. someone will get hurt. some will get shot. someone will get killed. it s not right. bob just this week, we learned the day before the january 6th insurrection a man who is radicalized by trump s lies was given a private tour of the capital by geor
during pride month, where did this hate come from? i m ayman mohyeldin, let s get started. tonight, we continue our look at extremism and radicalization through the lens of american radical, we began with a preview of the january six committee, we will take big to the afternoon, will focus on donald trump s attack the pressure officials to throw out joe biden s victory in casing states, one of the most brazen examples of that pressure was a call to georgia s election officials in which trump demanded they find a very specific number of votes. all i want to do is this. i just want to find 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have. that number would have been enough to declare trump the winner of georgia. two men on the other end of that phone call are expected to testify the fourth year in georgia secretary of state, brad raffensperger, and the top deputy, gabriel sterling, both men receiving death threats after being publicly attacked by trump and his allies. here
But democrats call the memo misleading and charge it is an effort to undermine the investigation in the 2016 election and the criminal probe being led by special counsel Robert Mueller. So today, were getting your thoughts on the memo and the russian probe. Republicans can call 2027488001. Democrats, 2027488000. And independents, 2027488002. You can also reach us on social media on twitter. Com cspanwj and on facebook at facebook. Com cspan. And that memo is topping the hitandmiss including the Washington Post says the g. O. P. Memo declassified on friday accused senior Law Enforcement officials of misleading a court in order to conduct a surveillance on a former Trump Campaign advisor. Fueling a growing distrust between the white house and republicans on one side and the Justice Department and the f. B. I. On another. Host were talking to you today, getting your reaction to the release of that memo. Tommy is calling in from tennessee on our independent line. Good morning, tommy. Calle
All right. Im going to take the opportunity of this lull to begin the session. So im not going to spend a lot of time on introductions. I do just want very briefly, with us from brookings and law affair, this is a real opportunity, because matt, my copanelists interviewee, im not sure what to call him when theres only two of us, has a real remarkable diversity of experience with 702. And so i actually met matt way back when he was working on gaugh guantanamo issues once upon a time. He became general counsel at nsa and went from there to run National Security. As i think youll hear a lot of 702 material. And so let me start by just asking you, on a scale of 1 to 10, how important is 702 to u. S. Counterterrorism mission and to other national skuecurity progrs and what other interests . If i can channel the movies, ill say 11, for those of you who have seen the movie. The amplifier goes to 11. Ive had a lot of conversations about and it is you know, it is important i think to understand
And brief introduction of our first speaker. Im mike franc, director of the washington, d. C. Programs office for the hoover institution. Welcome to sunrise or sunset, the future of section 702, the foreign Intelligence Surveillance act. Our first speaker will be john villasenor, who is a visiting fellow here at the hoover institution. He wears a number of hats. Hes also an affiliate at Stanford Center for International Security and cooperation. Hes a professor at ucla where he holds appointments in schools of engineering, public affairs, and governance. Hes also a visiting professor in the ucla school of law. His research focuses on the intersection of technology, policy, business law, and the wider ramifications of key technological trends and developments. Hes testified before congress, most recently on drones, privacy, and intellectual property. John is going to go through the basics of section 702, sort of like a 101 introduction to it, and that will set up the rest of our program