Absorb. For the 3 jackson, weve also agreed with the community to monitor rider ship. In part because we continue to have concerns about the overall strengths of jackson as a corridor but also to address any concerns about rider ship, significant rider ship changes over time. The lower haight issue it is a trade off. For the policy and governs committee we looked at three options, the proposal, compromise staff proposal or the proposal that would reduce on haight street and that proposal does address concerns for lower haight residents. It is expensive. We go from about 50 additional hours on haight street to 100. It was not costeffective to address this trade off. You had a lot of questions. Thats a good start. Maybe just one other with the inner sunset you spoke to the landscaping concern which can absolutely be addressed. I think we got a letter on that one. There was some discussion about the length of the bulbs and i know they originally proposed to be the full length of a 2car tr
Corridor but also to address any concerns about rider ship, significant rider ship changes over time. The lower haight issue it is a trade off. For the policy and governs committee we looked at three options, the proposal, compromise staff proposal or the proposal that would reduce on haight street and that proposal does address concerns for lower haight residents. It is expensive. We go from about 50 additional hours on haight street to 100. It was not costeffective to address this trade off. You had a lot of questions. Thats a good start. Maybe just one other with the inner sunset you spoke to the landscaping concern which can absolutely be addressed. I think we got a letter on that one. There was some discussion about the length of the bulbs and i know they originally proposed to be the full length of a 2car train and they have come down and there were some concerns that the length were, there wasnt clarity on those. Could you walk us through . Yes, i think that has to do a little b
To work on refining this after these changes are implemented. I think thats what i got earlier that we will continue to evaluate these things. Thats what i want to put down for the record, the 10 and 11 and make sure the connectivity is better as we move along. I want to talk expressly about the end judea because im a regular patron of nearly all the circumstances businesses that weve heard from. It was great to see the owner from progressive from the Hardware Store talking about the changes. As someone who regularly rides there, that intersection at 9th and judea is hoshg horrible. When you talk about 5 seconds here and there, when we multiplea multiply the changes, i think its savings on the corridor travel. If my commute is 30 minutes everyday and im saving three memberships a minutes a day each way times 5, thats 30 minutes more that i get to spend with my wife or family or whatever else i would like to be doing. Im just one guy. When you multiply that times tens of thousands of ri
Reliability which i think is fortunate to have. On the idea of timing, i think that timing is important. One of the things that will help guide our timing is the work that you still have to come on the budget. So, having an understanding of what the resource envelope will be for the next 2year budget will very much guide our work on phasing. But these proposals a lot of them are linked together and thats how we see them as staff as sort of packages of improvements and the 33, 9, 22, 55 changes is an example of one of those families of changes. The 10 and 12 and the 11th is another example of a set of links proposals. So our timing will be based on where we have the greatest need, where proposals are linked together and also particularly on the fleet as the new buses an arrive getting those on the corridor as quickly as possible. We work hard to ensure the timing of this work lines up with the procurement of the new vehicles and in particular getting the 60foot trolley vehicles back on
Haight issue it is a trade off. For the policy and governs committee we looked at three options, the proposal, compromise staff proposal or the proposal that would reduce on haight street and that proposal does address concerns for lower haight residents. It is expensive. We go from about 50 additional hours on haight street to 100. It was not costeffective to address this trade off. You had a lot of questions. Thats a good start. Maybe just one other with the inner sunset you spoke to the landscaping concern which can absolutely be addressed. I think we got a letter on that one. There was some discussion about the length of the bulbs and i know they originally proposed to be the full length of a 2car train and they have come down and there were some concerns that the length were, there wasnt clarity on those. Could you walk us through . Yes, i think that has to do a little bit with doing sketches in the field versus going back and doing the actual engineering in the office. I think, d