it was just to make brag. think twice before indicting a former president. trump even posted this on a social media site, making it look like he s raising a baseball bat against bragg. he also called him an animal. that post was later deleted. on friday, a law enforcement source told cnn that bragg had been threatened with assassination in a letter containing nonhazardous white powder it s a lot to process let me try and sort it out. remember signs initially pointed to the first trump indictment, possibly coming out of georgia, where fulton county d. a. fani willis is investigating his attempts to overturn the 2020 election there. and then it seemed that was going to be lapped by bragg and the hush money case. by the end of the week brag seemed to be slow walking. special counsel jack smith began to sprint. smith was appointed by merrick garland to look both at trump s role in the january 6th case and his handling of classified documents at mara lago. he scored two major vict
some conservative outlet but by the new york times and the washington post to discuss the alvin bragg case. if in fact it s so novel, risky and untested because they re trying to twin two different charges. why not just charge trump with the misdemeanor? for the falsification of the business records. first of all, it is definitely untested because to raise the misdemeanor to a felony, you have to show another crime. that doesn t make it difficult. it just makes it untested. the second crime i just told you i can t keep repeating myself. michael the justice department under donald trump declared that he had directed the crime, and michael did the time now that crime can be proven in new york state with the same evidence by mr bragg. so the answer to your question is, yes, it s novel. that doesn t mean it s difficult. the mr trump committed a crime under new york state law by doing something directing somebody to