Micromanaging Security News Today

The arb from tanzania made it very clear that the secretary of state was supposed to personally review security at high-threat areas. that is not hand it down to a deputy or an undersecretary or anyone else. that arb in the late 1990s said the secretary of state, himself or herself, was supposed to take responsibility and personally review those security plans. it appears she did not do that. so if you ask what could she have done, that would be a good start. >> we knew that a year or two ago. >...

Decided that the chain of command in terms of security at the embassies and consular facilities did not rise to the secretary of state. that the secretary of state was not involved in the micromanagement of security. >> shouldnt she have been? why wasnt she? >> i dont know that we want the secretary of state making security decisions at particular facilities around the world. thats a big job, secretary of state, and i dont know that we want her micromanaging security. >> if the secretary of stat...

Or herself, was supposed to take responsibility and personally review those security plans. it appears she did not do that. so if you ask what could she have done, that would have been a very good start. >> we knew that a year or two ago. >> look at the arb on benghazi, not the one that took place 20 years ago. the arb on benghazi, a non-partisan investigation, decided the chain of command in terms of security at the embassies and consular facilities did not rise to the secretary of state. that ...