Coelacanths illustrate the difference between real science and creationist science
Ken Ham says something stupid and dishonest again. https://twitter.com/aigkenham/status/662450677625569280The fish that forgot to evolve? Here’s the difference between observational and historical science: ow.ly/Ug1wU If you bother to read the awful article, it includes a standard creationist canard: Coelacanths haven't changed a bit over their long history, and this disproves evolution.
Source: scienceblogs.com