Page 2 - Name Information News Today

N notify the fbi if he thought there was something wrong but also saying that chris wrey was wrong when he testified that the fbi should be notified any time, anyone from a foreign government offers assistance to an american campaign. >> well, youre right. this is the president breaking with what youve heard from so many kancandidates saying they l not accept ffinformation and hi own fbi director saying we need to know about it. we want to know if a campaign is approached by a foreign entity. pr...

Vaccines i needed. i went interest from there and it blew up. steve: didnt you get advice from a nurse who told what you to get and then because you were 18 you went and got the shots, right? >> yeah. so i went to the public health department at n. my local town and i spoke to some of the people there. and they were very kind and they gave me information. i spoke to a family physician and from then on i went and made an appointment and a few months later i had about five vaccines i have more com...

Tell who is appeared here i many times on fox i respect him on the clinton foundation forwarding me information from james rosen one of the reporters that i respect most in terms of his methodology and investigative reporting to predict that the documents would be about the clinton foundation which i also put in my speech. so that explains those two things but that does not mean i learned them from julian assange i never had face time or smoke with her e-mail julian assange. .the exchange that i...

Respect enormously and expert on the clinton foundation forwarding me information from james rosen, one of the reporters that i respect most in terms of his meticulous methodology and his investigative reporting and coverage for fox predicting that the documents would be about to clinton foundation. which i also apposited to my speech. it does not mean i learned them from julian assange. i have never met, spoken with, skypeed with, face time or e-mailed julian assange. the exchange supplied to t...

Whats kind of stunning to me is that they are not interested in delving further into the trump tower meeting, into subpoenaing people who refused to testify before them and answer their questions because they say theyre not going to get the information they want anyway, so theyve decided not to waste their time any more. and the notion that the trump tower meeting was nothing more than ill advised. i think the point is the republicans have come to a conclusion, it is clear to me, i dont know if ...

Election chances when possible by discrediting secretary clinton and publicly con trasing her unfavorably to him. all three agencies agree with this judgment, cia and fbi have high confidence in this judgment, nsa, national security agency has moderate confidence. what does it say that republicans on the house intelligence committee are now rejecting that specific conclusion? >> wolf, this is the moment that the term house intelligence becomes an objection xymoron. clearly, the russians weighed ...

Weight on one side or the other discredits them completely. >> is the republican majority on the house intelligence committee, their investigation effectively exonerating vladimir putin by arguing in the election interference helped trump? >> i dont think it helps trump that much. it is what trump wants to hear, what trump will recite, but the intelligence committee in the house has so little credibility to begin with. remember, chair nunez was part of the one year ago, the bogus deep throat epi...

Begrudgingly said he sided with our intelligence agencies that russia did interfere in the election. it will be interesting to see now if he sides with the house intelligence committee here or our intelligence community who has decided russians did meddle in the election. and the second thing is how the president will use this to determine what he does going forward with special counsel investigation into russian meddling in the election, and if he tries to use this as a way to justify firing th...

Youve seen, senator, do you think any of the contacts between russians and trump campaign officials were inadvertent or ill advised as the house republican majority on the committee conclude? >> i think as james clapper said on your program, it depends how you define collaboration or collusion but certainly there was a lot of contact, and contact in the context of trying to get information and influence the election. so we are looking forward, now goes to special prosecutor to get to the real bo...

I dont think they are honest significant counter veiling on it. when you go through a case by tais with useful actional intelligence it reads like a lawyers brief. if they dagave them harsh interrogation we dont know if you didnt interrogate them so harshly you would have gotten the name information. what universe isec6g÷ corrobora not at important thing. in journalism do we say we have a source that corroborates it. it is extremely important. it can seem up fair we are told by the doj they cou...