Need Internment Decision News Today

They put another on the books. >> nina. >> i think its fair to say that this decision does give the president, this president and any president, more power than they had before for all practical purposes almost no bars that have to be crossed. that are too difficult to cross. if all you have to do is show theres arguably a connection to national security, almost anybody can make that argument. in some ways the trump administration is lucky that the first two of them, two versions of this got str...

>> let me do one thing on this is the other thing that happened tonight thats so unusual. thats an usual thing to occur in the middle of this decision. take a look at donald trump doing what his lawyers would advise against which is siting that disfavored precedent on this issue. >> what im doing is no different than what fdr. fdrs solution for germans, italians, japanese. >> youre for internment camps? >> this is a president highly respected by all. he did the same thing. if you look at what he...

Its view on a totallyunrelated historical case that until today remained a shameful precedent on the books in american court history. the supreme court infamously upheld the legality of japanese internment. a precedent thats been discussed a lot lately given trumps internment and separation of immigrant families. in response about the travel ban, the conservative majority on this court writes this. if old decision upholding internment was wrong the day it decided and has no place in law under th...

Decisions, not the courts, not outsiders. >> right. i think youre eluding to a point thatnina was making earlier in other case law in controversial situations we know the court or a block of the court doesnt like to second guess potential national security in realtime. >> lower courts have made this decision before also. i mean if you look back, a federal judge said that a federal court should not even hear a case related to determining whether or not the chief executive can make or decide who c...

Emphatically and finally said that happy need internment decision was wrong and if so, was donald trump wrong to invoke it? >> i cant speak for the president and i have not read the full roreport or the full ruling from the supreme court. i do agree with you its very unusual they would go back that far and bring something up like this. i think ill have to stand on my earlier comments that what makes this such a landmark decision is the supreme court said our president has the sole authority to m...

Little place. there are couple of nooks and crannies its conceivable that litigation could put pressure on the administration to grant many more waivers in the ban and to let people here when they have medical problems, when they have jobs. >> which is partly -- >> scholarly endevours. >> which is partly what justice briar were getting at is saying how much can you hide behind exceptions if they arent meani meaningful. i think the cross talk was rich. i want you both to stay with me for a perspe...