Page 3 - Negative Coverage News Today

Deliberately peddling falsehoods. >> thats true. but if you know you made the assumption you want to go to war and you are crafting bits and pieces of intelligence to make that case, and ignoring the vast amount of intelligence. because we havent been inside iraq with weapons inspectors in four years. howie: in fairness -- >> he got a lot of negative coverage in noise question about it. but i dont think during the primary season and even during the general he got the kind of -- there is one thin...

Down. the thing is, the problem for you, jesse, nancy pelosi and you are on the same side. what are you going to do? >> jesse: its scary. what are you going to do? >> kimberly: that happened to me one time, due to marriage. >> juan: i have written about this and i came out on the side of al green, not nancy pelosi. >> jesse: that doesnt surprise me. >> juan: 70% of democrats think this guy is nuts and we should impeach. >> jesse: you need a crime in order to impeach. >> kimberly: the democrats a...

Internally here. general kelly put a clamp down on a lot of leaks early on when he got here. it appears as though some of those things are back but moving to eradicate those. its unacceptable. it not only derails the president but all the incoming quite frankly. 91% negative coverage. this president has been able to do record-setting things in record-setting time and taking off task and message because of peoples selfish action. it has to stop. >> bill: he calls them traitors and exaggeration in...

Hes doing is really unfair and its not paying for his critics. >> martha: talking about that number, 91% negative coverage. tallied up how much negative coverage out there and it is astonishing because when you look at what happened yesterday, the end of the iran deal. people can differ on whether or not they think that was a good idea, karl, and then the release of the hostages and the promise of this meeting that it looks like its going to happen in june. you would think that there was absolut...

5% positive coverage. now, numbers dont mean much unless you contrast it so lets look at what the previous president got in his first year, 20% negative coverage. president trump 5% positive. president obama 20% negative. and it was bumpy sometimes with health care but it tells you its not just bias in the mede yeah, sean, but that of the blatant variety. >> i did 195 polls on cnn fake news alone. you know what ill do tomorrow night? all 195. >> really? just do a drinking game. >> you watch the ...

Gets 5% positive coverage. numbers dont mean much unless you can trust it was something so lets look at the previous hisident, what he got in first year. only 20% negative coverage. president trump, 5% coverage. president obama, 20% negative. as you said, president trump had plenty of accomplishments, it was bumpy sometimes, but how you get 5%, i have no idea. what it tells you is that there is not just bias in the media, butye that of the malignant variety.an >> sean: i did 195 [bleep]holes on ...

An op-ed to argue the president is suffering from early onset dementia. how does joe scarborough know it. he said it came from a source. unless the source is the presidents doctor we cant go ahead of this. pew did an end of the year analysis of president trumps coverage. he only gets 5% positive coverage while president obama received 20% negative coverage. so anybody who says there is no bias in media it puts it to rest. >> if you want the press to like you try not attacking us day and night. >...

>> the author is a garbage author of a garbage book. i know it brings a lot of you guys a lot of joy to try to stick the knife in but the reality is page after page after page of the book is false. the reality is the president is a political genius who won against a field of 17 incredibly talented people who took down the bush dynasty, the clinton dyna dynasty, took down the entire media complex with its 90% negative coverage. all these so-called political geniuses in washington, whether it be a...

That don jr. didnt walk these jumos touch his fathers office. did president trump meet with any of the people? >> i have no knowledge of anything to do with that meeting. >> okay. >> but what i can tell you unequivocally is that the allegations and insinuations in this book, which are a pure work of fiction are nothing but a pile of trash through and through. to your comment, he was also the presidents chief strategist. so one of the other tragedies of this grotesque work of fiction is its portr...

And with respect to the trump tower meeting that he is talking about, he wasnt even there when this want down. so he is not really a remotely credible source on any of it. it reads like an angry, vindictive person spouting off to a highly discredible author. the book is book is best understood as a poorly work of fiction. and i will also say the author is a garbage author of a gorge book. >> and miller wasnt done. he defended the president against the books claim that mr. trump is not fit for of...