The term zero tolerance has been used as a pejorative term to criticize broken windows, and appropriately so. Broken windows wasnt zero tolerance. Zero tolerance, first of all, implies a zealotry about you will have no discretion. And the second thing is, it says you dont have any discretion which is exactly what we want to avoid which sets up a high arrest thing. But let me just talk about, zero tolerance can be a useful tool at times, at particular locations around particular problems. But you have to be very specific about that. Think, for example, of just a very simple example, school buses. We simply understand that the risks of people passing school buses is so great and the consequence is so great that we dont want any discretion about that. We want to send out a message you pass a school bus thats discharging or getting children, youre in deep, deep trouble. So and i could give you other examples of that. So zero tolerance is antithetical to the whole approach of broken windows
Are here at the National Postal museum at the heart of this book and one of the wonderful things about the way they have organized this book is that the letters really pull you in period 160 years ago and help you understand the sensuality of the great when families were frequently separated for the first times. They have provided the information you need to not win the understand the Family Networks by community networks, postal network, what is happening geopolitically in the United States during the civil war. Really looking forward to this talk. Lynn is a curator at the smithsonian National Postal museum. She specializes in the use of the u. S. History postal service. As well as my fellow soldiers, letters from world war i from which you can see at the smithsonian secretaries Research Prize in 2018. Thomas pay own creates a lighter than air collection with balloons, lamps and air ships at the Smithsonian National air and space Museums Research focuses on in the civil war as well as
With these Television Companies support cspan 2 as a public service. Now it is my distinct pleasure to introduce this book and its editors, tom inland. The wall to his family letters are here at the National Postal museum at the heart of this book and one of the wonderful things about the way they have organized this book is that the letters really pull you in period 160 years ago and help you understand the sensuality of the great when families were frequently separated for the first times. They have provided the information you need to not win the understand the Family Networks by community networks, postal network, what is happening geopolitically in the United States during the civil war. Really looking forward to this talk. Lynn is a curator at the smithsonian National Postal museum. She specializes in the use of the u. S. History postal service. As well as my fellow soldiers, letters from world war i from which you can see at the smithsonian secretaries Research Prize in 28 1918.
America . And second, what do you mean by needs . Do you mean American Labor or American Capital . And when you say needs, what makes manufacturing so special . When we look at the crowd, most people here dont make things. They spend all day reading and writing and talking people. Whats wrong with the Service Economy . Why do we need a renaissance to be better . Im a great fan of the Service Economy. I think theres an enormous amount of value created there. When we talk about america, we think about the royal we. And i would also add the longterm health of the country as a place to do innovation. Okay . And the principal thesis in the book that comes out of our research is that unlike the reputation that a lot of people associate with manufacturing, we actually think the ability to make things is fundamental to the ability to sustain innovation over the longer term. Especially when you have products or processes. And i think that was mr. Immelt referred to that earlier today. When you
Times, but as i also said theres people out there who are flouting the restrictions and by flooding the restrictions theyre putting other people in danger. Do you agree with that . Yes this incredibly different balancing act to be struck and we have seen people ignoring the rules and weve had cases everywhere i think of the scottish chief medical officer with you in on the telegraph front page coming up ministers taking a trip to visit his parents, there is really difficult lines to try and establish, what one persons quick trip to say hi and drop off medication on the one hand thats one thing, but then you have other examples where people are actively socialising and not respecting socialising and not respecting social distancing rules, its a real challenge and i think we have seen in some of those socially aware politicians is it really been thinking about how they deal with open spaces with green spaces weve had debates about park closures and how you do with the fact that children,