Nonbiased Finding News Today

That if he was acting corruptly, wrongfully, that it was unlikely he was going to confess to president zelensky that he was asking for the investigations explicitly to help his prospects . In my experience, you almost never have a defendant or someone who is engaging in misconduct who would ever explicitly say in this case, president zelensky, im going to bribe you now or im going to ask for a bribe for i am now going to extort you. That is not the way these things work. Thank you. And going bac...

Would say was vindicated and starting this fisa warrant that it was finding to do what was appropriate but thats because they are saying there are other information, so what was that? i dont know if that includes something president trump could release, but it mustve come from the intel community or something, might not be what you are pointing out. the steele dossier he admits is based on single source info so there mustve been something else for this report and for the fbi for many years now s...

Discretionary judgment and was it appropriate to use fisa surveillance? was it appropriate to use informants whether they were planted inside the campaign or whether they were targeted at members of the campaign in order to gather information. that is really the issue here. what drove those decisions and why did they make them? horowitz is basically saying is similar to what he said in the hillary clinton emails investigation not my job, and i am very interested in what the basis is for the nonb...

>> back on legal analysis now, what is the headline coming from this report now that weve all had a chance to dig into it? >> it certainly is a big deal that they did make a finding that there was bias or particularly political bias that drove the investigation, that said, i think people are going to find this frustrating in the same way that horowitzs report on hillary clinton email investigation was frustrating. he says right up front at the beginning we are not here to second-guess discretion...

Has not. the finding is that it was not political bias that led to the investigation of the relationships between the trump campaign and potential interference, now proven interference by the russians in 2016. i think that there are lots of people, we can talk about steel, we can talk about exactly why he acted in the way that he did, we can talk about clerical and clerical omissions that did not change or somehow leaves that document inaccurate as we presented to the court, all of that we can d...