Page 332 - Observer News Today

When you set them up so you can cleave them away, then what you have done is destroyed all of humanity. thats the road were on. i think carl bernstein said if were not in a constitutional crisis it is imminent. i feel were at a conscience crisis, a crisis of humanity. how do we treat one another? why do we treat each other this way? for the love of heavens, reporters are people. they live in a community. they are part of the community. they are trained to be a disinterested third-party observer....

All those women who came for toward say hey, im an alabama republican too, but you need to know about this guy and his thing with little teen girls, thanks to all that sordid almost not safe for work toxic slurry of these alabama republican men, and thanks to democrats deciding last year to say yeah, we know its alabama, but in circumstances like this, we think we might be able to compete there too, thanks to all of those unlikely little stars aligning, jeff sessions u.s. alabama senate seat is ...

A total and complete shutdown of muslims entering the united states has later been a bit more quiet on that point but people have always suspected that this band targeted muslims its critics say its a violation of the united states constitutional protections for freedom of religion and even though the court ruled that this ban did not have an anti muslim bias we saw really scathing to send from the justices in the court who form the dissenting opinion they essentially said a reasonable observer ...

They look at the text of this executive order which says nothing about religion and did not consider the pres.s tweets in public statement about cracking down on muslims. justice sonia sotomayor invoked the 1924 ruling that upheld the presidential directive ordering japanese americans into internment camps, she said of the court had considered the statement in this case, quote, a reasonable observer would conclude the proclamation was motivated by anti-muslim animus but since this is the third v...

Cant be called out for being n intellectually dishonest. just enough, but not enough to take it seriously. >> especially for someone who is not a lawyer, just a lay observer for these things. those of us who are not lawyers have been looking at the trump decision and its more radical policy proposals. it sort of seemed like the presidents public remarks, talking about wanting to ban muslims from this country, the way hes justified other policies, the way hes talked about wanting no due process f...

Not a lawyer, just a lay observer for these things. those of us who are not lawyers have been looking at the trump decision and its more radical policy proposals. it sort of seemed like the presidents public remarks, talking about wantingo ban muslims from this country, wait hes justified other policies, the way hes talked about wanting no due process for immigrants, the way hes talked about lots of different things that have an impact on the way the court considers these policies, it seems like...

Rethink his position on banning muslims from entering the country. he answered, no. a month later at a rally in south carolina, trump told an apocryphal story about united states general john pershing killing a large group of muslim insurgents in the philippines with bullets dipped in pigs blood in the early 1900s. in march 2016, he expressed his belief that islam hates us. he said, were having problems with muslims coming into this country. the justice continues, despite several opportunities t...

Rethink his decision on banning muslims from entering the country. he answered, no. a month later at a rally in south carolina, trump told an apocrhphal story about united states general john per singh killing a large group of muslim insurgents in the philippines with bullets dipped in pigs blood in the early 1900s. justice continues. despite seral opportunities to do so, president trump has never disavowed any of his prior statements about islam. instead he has continued to make remarks that a ...

Masquerades behind a facade of national security concerns. although the majority briefly recounts a few of the statements and background events that form the basis of plaintiffs constitutional challenge, that highly a bridged account does not tell the story. the full record paints a far more harrowing picture. from which a reasonable observer could conclude its from hostility and animus towards the muslim faith. on december 7, 2015, the president issued a formal statement calling for a total and...

Current laws absent the proclamation. none of the features supports the proclamation that its rooted in legitimate national security interest. the first amendment stand as a bulwark against religious differences and religious plurality and tolerance. that constitutional promise is why, for centuries now, people have come to this country from every corner of the world to share in the blessing of religious freedom. instead of vindicating those principles, todays ruling tosses them aside and gives ...