Page 333 - Observer News Today

Countries? no. north korea and venezuela are also mentioned. so he said this was about whether presidents can control immigration policy and visa structures. this is something that is uniquely within the power of the presidency. so because there was nothing in the order itself that indicated any sort of religious discrimination, that was enough for the majority. the dissenters saw it differently. >> and they did. and sabrina, justice sotomayor in her dissent said a reasonable observer would see ...

Dissenting opinion they essentially said a reasonable observer would have to conclude that this travel ban it was in fact motivated by anti muslim sentiment now as you say this is the third iteration of the travel ban gay notoriety at the beginning of his presidency as a man and im muslim as a ban on muslims but weve seen lower courts block it they had to rethink it twice and the fact that the top court in the united states has now upheld the third version of his policy is going to be a big poli...

Religious neutrality. it leaves undisturbed a policy first advertised openly as she ques here a total and complete shutdown of muslims entering the united states because the policy now masquerades behind a facade of national security concerns. she said the repackaging does little to cleanse presidential prok lowmation of the appearance of discrimination based on the evidence in the record a reasonable observer would say it was motivated by anti-muslim animus. they turn a blind eye to the pain an...

Message here. youre really begging to get reversed as an appellate court if you try to turn around and say that the travel ban is unconstitutional. so it goes back on a reman to the lower court but i dont expect the decision to change unless theres some judges hell bent making temporary headlines. >> dana: perhaps theyll drop it. thats the appropriate thing to do. justice sotomayor said taking all the ed together, a reasonable observer would conclude that the proclamation was driven by anti-musl...

Does little to cleanse presidential proclamation number 9645 of the appearance of discrimination that the presidents words have created. based on the evidence in the record, a reasonable observer would conclude that the proclamation was motivated by anti-muslim animus." and with that lets bring in our panel. byron york, chief political correspondent of the "washington examiner" ." mollie hemingway, senior editor at the federalist and charles lane, opinion writer for "the washington post" ." sign...

Findings following a worldwide at multiagency review that entry of the aliens will be detrimental to the national interest. >> what we are doing is looking at countries in a rational way. any of the countrys name said the government has controlled in the vetting process works and terrorism is not a problem. >> with the majority didnt do was look to the various statements. president trump to decide whether the ban was voted by religious animus. the proclamation is expressly -- the text says nothi...

Our team is about to turn that around. nothing from house speaker paul ryan in that news conference he was holding just moments ago at the half hour. nbc news justice correspondent pete williams is with us. pete, to talk about cory bookers point there, and this is something that was echoed by the justice who wrote in a dissent based on the evidence in the case that she says a reasonable observer would conclude the proclamation was motivate i did anti-muslim animus. so the dissenters seem to be r...

Dissent that based on the evident of the case, a reasonable observer would conclude it was motivated byani. she said her colleagues who voted for the travel ban arrived at the result by ignoring the facts misconstruing the legal precedent and turning a blind eye to the pain and suffering it inflicts upon countless families. this is interesting. neil, the issue the court seems to have addressed in the majority ruling is that the pain and suffering of the victims is not at issue here. its whether ...

Bouied today. one of the key things we have heard so far. remember, this is a version, after that first travel ban, the one that was announced right after the inauguration was changed right after the president modified it. the president complained that it was watered down. the president is now saying today that he is not going to go back and try to essentially toughen up or change what is currently in place, saying this is enough, the supreme court has decided this is what its going to be, steve...

Rally. it felt like something different was happening than a standard republican presidential rally. there was toxicity in the air. obviously i wasnt there on the ground, but as an observer, it looked like there was a lot of vitriol and mob mentality that we hadnt seen before, and i do agree with you that newt gingrich is the catalyst for a lot of this. it wasnt just that your opponent is the other side but your opponent is the enemy, evil, doing bad things to you and your family members. i thin...