Page 49 - Obstruction Case News Today

So, what happened first. >> he told the story backwards today. >> russian interference happened first. so what were you interfering? you were interfering with russian interference -- or obstructing. so, yeah, logically you tell it in the order in which it happened. and i think that can be a little bit confusing and a little bit unsettling if youre new to this thing. >> andy, if youre making a case and youre trying to tell a story, thats what i keep not -- because we were told by many house democ...

Could also be testifying alongside robert mueller, and so that is pretty unique. the president has been tweeting about this this morning. clearly this is on his mind. hes making a big deal out of the fact this is request from robert mueller and hes going to be helping with some of the answers, which is pretty rich because the president also conferred with his lawyers. >> and one of the questions i assume will be asked and maybe you can help us on this, why didnt you demand a sit down interview w...

Mueller said from many centrist and leftist-center democrats to not only impeach the president but at least begin impeachment proceedings. >> what are you hearing in terms of moments that broke through? what do members expect to make it onto the local newscast? a lot of sense just watching it in realtime, it was really the second hearing before the house intel committee where the questions were more focused on what the russians did and trumps campaign enthusiasm for their assistance that broke t...

But we didnt make that determination because of the office of legal counsel direction, the policy direction coming from justice and i think that is really important for people to understand. he was constrained. >> greg: juan, you saying hes special counsel doesnt make him special, hes still a prosecutor, no prosecutor -- >> juan: no, hes not a ordinary prosecutor, jesse. >> jesse: no attorney general has power to exonerate anybody, innocent until proven guilty in court of law. >> juan: i love it...

Percentage up, number one or number two in the country and nobody would have believed that. west virginia is doing great. im going to west virginia. we did have a big case today. we won the asylum case in washington, which frankly, you should be asking about that because that is the real deal. i cant believe how nice you are today, go ahead, give me a question. [question indiscernible] >> pres. trump: no, because we did nothing wrong, very simple, nothing was done wrong, this was all a big hoax....

Because he forgot, he didnt really know, he didnt know too much, he didnt know anything. they were texting. they were the ones with "in case you should lose, well have an experience policy," the same situation, bad situation. what they did and what mueller did, he deleted text messages back and forth, probably thousands of them. that is a serious problem. >> mr. president, have you heard from kim jong-un? [question indiscernible] [questioning over each other] >> pres. trump: i think it is going ...

Committee, great chairman, adam schiff, we will hear from now and also joined by elijah cummings chair of the government oversight committee, a committee that is winning courts in case, as well. i will yield with great respect to all three of our chairman and we will take questions. yield to distinguished chairman of the judiciary chairman, mr. nadler. >> thank you, madam speaker. today the american people heard directly about what the special counsel investigation uncovered. as to russia interf...

Hmm, turns out the book was better than the movie, especially for the democrats. you cant get away from the fact, that is what democrats tried to show today. they laid out the case for obstruction, laid out that russia interfered and as you heard, even at the very end, from adam schiff, intelligence committee, he still thinks there is a case to be made here and the one thing mueller was clear on is russia interfered in 2016 to help trump and they continue to interfere as we head toward 2020. >> ...

Obstructing crime he didnt commit or obstructing crime that the lead investigator said he wasnt obstructed on and of course you fight back when you have been framed by democrats and investigated by democrats coming after your company, your family, your personal assets and trying to set perjury traps for you, tee up impeachment and set up obstruction case against you, you are going to fight back. he fought back, he complied. he never claimed executive privilege, handed over thousands of documents...

Was charged with obstruction. >> but theres no exoneration. its interesting to look at the tone of the democrats and the press conference. in the tone that the president had when he was talking to the press that we had at the very top of the show and those are so different. that is such a contrast. as he says it is all about objects. its very obvious how the objects are -- >> could get a better haircut if that were the case. final thoughts? >> i thought nancy pelosi made her point. she said, loo...