does. but his aides and his campaign, the white house, they have been sending out very negative messages about lieutenant colonel vindman. they tried to use something morrison said behind closed doors when he said there were people that questioned vindman s judgment at nsc, specifically fiona hill that we ll hear from thursday. i his opening statement, i think he realized how much play that has got. he said he wasn t here to criticize his colleagues. saw vindman prepared to address it as he was there to testify earlier. he brought a performance review from fiona hill, the official, that morrison had the conversation with, where it praised him multiple times and his performance in the job. you see tim morrison and kurt volker, beginning to walk back in. they ll sit down and the hearing will resume. the next round will be the five minute sessions where all of the members, democrats and
republicans, they have five minutes to ask questions. it will start with the chairman, adam schi
happened in the past and apply its own laws. concerning the allegations, i have stressed that no one in the new team governing ukraine had anything to do with anything that may have happened in 2016. they were making television shows at the time. i also said that it is not credible to me that former vice president biden would have been influenced anyway by financial or personal motives in carrying out his duties as vice president. a different issue is whether some individual ukrainians may have attempted to influence the 2016 election or thought they could buy influence. that is at least as possible. but the accusation vice president biden acted inappropriately, did not seem credible to me. i connected them by text and later by phone. they met in person on august 2nd 2019. in conversations with me
following that meeting, which i did not attend, mr. giuliani said that he stressed the importance of the ukraine conducting investigations of what happened in the past. and he said it is t
base of the republican party and to me. so i believe that he was at with very few defections. that may change, but right now i least affected by those and believed those and believed they were think that s a correct negative? assessment by the white house, believed that they were that they ve got the senate tied negative and was conveying them up in a way that will protect to the president. so was it problematic that he the president from actually being removed from office. believed they were negative i think the two variables, views? yes, the whole thing was ned, would, in my guess, drawing problematic. ambassador taylor testified on my past sort of in republican that on july 2nd, you told politics, would be public ukrainians that they needed to, quote, cooperate on opinion, should you see attacks investigations, end quote. you re now saying that you don t on colonel vindman inching this recall saying those words; is from 51% support to 53, 54, 55. that correct? i do
concerning the allegations, i stressed that no one in the new team governing ukraine had anything to do with anything that may have happened in 2016. they were making television shows at the time. i also said that it is not credible to me that former vice president biden would have been influenced in any way by financial or personal motives in carrying out his duties as vice president. a different issue is whether some individual ukrainians may have attempted to influence the 2016 election or thought they would buy influence. that is at least plausible given ukraine s reputation for corruption. but the accusation that vice president biden acted inappropriately did not seem at all credible to me. after that meeting, i connected mayor giuliani and mr. yermak by text and later by phone. they met in person on august 2nd, 2019. in conversations with me following that meeting, which i
did not attend, mr. giuliani said that he had stressed the importance of ukraine conducting investigation
joe biden, come on over to ukraine! it s never going to happen! spewing all they had to do apparently was announce an investigation. okay, that is it for us. they hearing is set to resume shortly, but now we have special report up next. spewing that evening, welcome to washington. i am bret baier. continuing coverage of the impeachment hearings day 3, nine hours on capitol hill as you look alive at the chairman adam schiff getting ready to gavel into the next round of questions this from the lawmakers themselves, while we wait, we will bring in our panel here. byron york, chief political correspondent of the national and josh holmes, former top advisor to mitch mcconnell, now president of the cavalry consultants as you look there at tom morrison, tim morris and heading back in for testimony, and kurt volker right behind him. quickly down the row, your thoughts on today so far? today is the day that we
found out there was a difference of opinion about this trump-zelensky call