Latest Breaking News On - Off limits - Page 1 : vimarsana.com
star students chance to speak it to her peers has been ripped away as quickly as it was given to her. so, what message do we want to send to her? that in order to succeed, you must stay silent about your beliefs? the systemic silencing of one side of the debate is not the hallmark of a healthy or vibrant democracy. in order to have a debate, have the free exchange of ideas, we can't keep moving the goal posts, deciding who can speak and who can't, what causes do deserve a platform and which should be d platform, and what words we are allowed to use, and which are off-limits. in order for speech to be truly free, it must apply to everyone, regardless of whether or not you may agree with it. usc valedictorian joins us next. vaccinated, it could still be you. i'm too old if you're under 45,
StudentsDebateMessageOrderStarSideSilencingSystemicPeersBeliefsOneCauses
transcript, and i think most of the press in that room understands that that's off limits as well for the protection of these people, particularly given the environment in which they're living, which is a donald trump who continues to tweet about participants in this proceeding and who will not face a hearing for criminal contempt, at least until this coming tuesday. so given that, i think everybody is trying to exercise some caution here. it was chilling to hear her say i don't think i can participate anymore because of how much information is already out there about me. i have my friends and family texting me asking is this you. that's got to be an uncomfortable and frightening place for any person in this city to be right now. >> lisa rubin, our eyes and ears. thank you very much for joining us. let me bring into our coverage, isaac arnsdorf, the national political reporter for "the washington post." he was the pool reporter today inside the courtroom, tell us what that was like. >> i was actually out in the
Donald-j-trumpPeoplePressMostProtectionTranscriptRoomParticipantsProceedingEnvironmentOff-limitsHearing
poll. you have steve scalise, the majority leader, announcing the house will vote on the resolution to hold under biden in contempt of congress sunday. your thoughts on what they continue to do here with hunter biden? >> there is a right way and wrong way to go about an investigation. i think looking at hunter biden 's past business dealings, something that could be a congressional matter of inquiry, the same way with jared kushner and his two billion dollar investment from saudi arabia after he served in the trump administration. so, i don't think this is off limits, but the way you do that is by doing it. you hold an investigation, and it don't make an impeachment inquiry, when they have yet -- there is not a single republican out there who can tell us, can name a crime or potential crime, and alleged crime that joe biden committed that is worthy of an impeachment inquiry.
WayDes-moines-registerWhite-houseHunter-bidenContempt-of-congressSteve-scaliseThoughtsResolutionSomethingInvestigationMatterInquiry
has been impeached but not convicted or was never impeached in the first place, and that's a frightening future. pragmatically, putting aside all the constitutional interpretation, anybody watching that or listening to it here this morning as we have, i think it's intelligible to them that the idea that you can only be criminally held -- that has nothing to do with the system of government under which we did. >> if the president did something very wrong, criminally wrong, he or she could resign from office precluding, perhaps, an impeachment, and then invoking a crazy doctrine and that would put me off limits for criminal prosecution, and i think the government articulated that well in its argument, and there are a couple things at play, ana, one, pointing to all of the other presidents doesn't
InterpretationPlaceListeningAnybodyFuturePragmaticallyIdeaNothingSystemPresidentImpeachmentSomething