about what putin things or what he threatens or anything else ife it doesn t have if its not based on reality that s going to help the united states. i m all about taking risks and i did it in combat. not a bad to the united states doing it if it made sense and it had a goodch chance of success. this doesn t mean also we didn t even get to tonight whether it actually enhances america s securityenam. that s another that kind of is even discussed at all. but lieutenant colonel david burisma plays a very importantry conversation tonight actually asking the questions, many of which were not askedas the last time we got going on a war ing two thousand o three. an but we really appreciate it. thank you . now the neocons are aligning themselves with the media to er draw us closer to war . but whose interests are they actually promoting? not the american people. the new quinnipiac poll finds that 75 percent supporting helping ukraine without risking war with russia further. 54% support nato s
actions of vladimir putinhe and that means getting the people of ukraine the migst that they would need d to fight and shoot down some of the russian aircraft. history will judge us if we don t now and if we don t act strongly military strategists who specialize in battlefield tactics and game out every move and every step of the way, they ask serious questions, questions like will migs actually help turn the tide in ukrainene and can ukraine evn maintain these older fighter planesra or is the media s position that it s better to consider these issues after we ve spent billionste replacing poland s makes now this speeone now ask later approach is how the us ended up without victory in iraq and in an embarrassing defeat in afghanistanrr. we spent trillions we lost thousands of our brave troops. weas lost contractors and hundreds of thousands of iraqisf civilians to fight a wa that created an exodus of iraqi
yes, yes, yes. and now that biden is in office, the new york times has magically authenticated the emails found on hunter s infamous laptop. but of course the media is trying to cover their tales by just playing dumb professional do. michael isikoff tweeting didn t see this coming. joining us now is kellyanne conway, former senior counselor to president trump, the author of here s the deal. na kellyanne, the intentional suppression of of this was a total disgrace and might have had serious electoral consequences. your reaction to this tonight? te it was clear the election interference. look, let s review the facts. hunter biden was under a tax increase investigation by obama biden s department of justice. soso somebody should be a little bit more than curious, perhaps even suspiciousf if something that appears to be hunter biden s laptop suddenly appears and there are emails on there that could in fact be broadening that could in fact comport with the broader investigation at that
mocker which had to do with allegations of foreign money laundering, allegations of violatingne the act. and so i think the curious was the key now with russia collusion, they can t that conclusion collusion was the conclusion they said will produce the evidenceco at a time in the future. the evidencee had and just denied it justd suppressed it completely. and it s important forlyta a vey important reason that you just it s important for an essential reason. you just noted 16% of biden voters from 2020 have toldvo pollsters they would have changed their vote had they known this was true and had they known the extent ofti it. and let s not let the new york times and their friends, or the media off the hook tooy much. the story today was not about his laptop. they did not say we re sorry. ititin was buried in about the twenty seventh paragraph in a story about hunter paying off a one million dollar taxneta liabilityx but still facing federal charges while his father is nowwhil in part of