Page 62 - Omissions News Today

Opened the investigation did not become aware in the steele dossier until two weeks later. they did take issue about the way they went about monitoring. the report identified, quote, at least 17 significant inaccuracies or omissions in fisa applications for a warrant. the mueller investigation has resulted in convictions for six of the presidents associates, including a campaign chairman, cochairman, and national security adviser. so there you have it, joe. the inspector general of the justice d...

Support this stuff. at that point, when their entire case collapsed, what do they do? they kept on investigating the president well into his administration, after the case collapsed. but here to me is the damning thing. they not only didnt tell the court that what they had been relying on was completely, you know, rubbish, they actually started putting in things to bolster this steele report by saying we talked to the sources and they appeared to be truthful. but they dont inform the court what ...

Open a full-blown counterintelligence investigation specifically using the techniques they did. from the very first day of this investigation, which was july 31st, 2016, all the way to its end in september 2017, there was not one incriminatory bit of evidence to come in. it was all exculpatory. the core statement in my opinion by the i.g. is that these irregularities, these misstatements, these omissions were not satisfy factually explained. and that leaves open the impossible to infer bad faith...

Surveillance orders. the errors were not political. hes referring to the fact that both things can be true. this is ainuance that can get lost. reading here from the report, 17, quote, errors or omissions in the carter page warrant application. thats not nothing. but also, quote, no intentional misconduct on the part of the agents. and as i mention, no bias. do you accept that both there were mistakes with you, but there was no larger anti-trump witch-hunt found in this report? >> well, i know t...

Interview since the report was released, barr told pete williams why he is so concerned about the fbi handling of the investigation. >> so thats hard to explain. the core statement in my opinion by the ig is that these irregularities, misstatements, omissions were not satisfactorily explained. and i think that leaves open the possibility to infer bad faith. >> this is where the inspector general is most critical of the fbi. when you say bad faith, are you saying bias? there can be all sorts of b...

Investigation and it was properly predicated with us going-forward with that investigation. it was malpractice for us not to open this investigation. all of the statements that it was a hoax are wrong. the investigation was not a coup or a coup attempt. >> having said that, he does point out many mistakes that were made with respect to errors and omissions. those have to be addressed, they should be addressed, both with respect to the individuals involved. the director chris ray is take ing -- i...

Is professor turley. let me start with the best direct evidence of any potential quid pro quo or impeachable scheme. this is president trumps phone call with zelensky for which the national security council and the white house situation room staff prepared a call summary. according to testify from tim morrison at the nfc, the summary was accurate and complete. nsc staff member colonel alex vindman testified that any omissions in the summary were not significant and that editing was not done mali...

The fbis leadership for their handling of the investigation in some critical ways as hes discovered errors and omissions when fbi officials -- the policy adviser carter page. including a damning new revelation that an fbi lawyer doctored an email that was presented to the fisa court. a mixed bag of conclusions. but attorney general bill barr has told others this report wont be the last word on the matter. adds the inspector general was constricted. so hes tapped a u.s. attorney to continue a cri...

Congress 1 and 2. it said devin nunes and rudy giuliani and john solomon. it had a list of the names. you dont have to do that. if you are trying to get the number and the phreakers. -- frequency. thats a point for republicans. we are back to the math. there is no math on this committee that will change. 24-17 has been the vote. i think it was 24-15 when 2 republicans were in the restrooms. >> because they had to take a break. >> [laughing]. >> yes, but that number wont change out of this commit...

Conclusion that they met that very low threshold to get the investigation started. the problem for the fbi, and for democrats that want to somehow declare that as of the victory, everything after that is an indictment of the process. even if there was a basis to open it, everything that came after it was exculpatory. there was no reason to continue to play the second part of this that is really important, when they got to the stage of a fisa application in october, as you see and hear, this repo...