Page 63 - Omissions News Today

Start with the best direct evidence of any potential quid pro quo or impeachable scheme. this is president trumps phone call with zelensky for which the national security council and the white house situation room staff prepare to call summary. according to testimony from tim morrison, the summary was accurate and complete. lieutenant colonel alexander vindman testified that any omissions in the summary were not significant and that editing was not done maliciously. president trump has declassif...

Except far worse. this was an overthrow of government. >> when attorney general barr picked durham, i was skeptical. if durham was so nonpolitical, he never would have issued that statement. >> in the horowitz report, it describes in great detail how the fbi found out that the sub source for this the steele dossier disavowed it. they used it two more times to get warrants. they never told the court, and they actually lied to the court about the interview. if that doesnt bother you, you hate trum...

The democrats went first and then the republicans. questioned staffers under oath. we will talk about that process in just a moment. in the meantime, there was other big breaking news. the inspector general report on the fbi, the fisa warrant into carter page came out. the bottom line is the ig concluded that the russia probe was warranted and the fbi and the justice department will undertake an audit to talk about process and proceedings. the ig found 17 significant errors or omissions with tha...

John durham, united states attorney has the benefit of a criminal investigation including access to a grand jerry. michael horowitz does not have that so i think we need to wait and see what the basis is for this disagreement but it is very fundamental and obviously very important. everyone has agreed that the fbi did not handle the fisa application well especially with omissions so what are those omissions? what should the court remember? we are talking about representations to a court. what is...

>> is a disgrace what has happened with respect to the things that were done to our country. it should never again happen to another president. >> the president zeroing in on the findings that they were omissions and irregularities in the application for a so-called fisa warrant to begin a surveillance of trump campaign consultant carter page. >> it is incredible, far worse than i would have ever thought possible. this was an attempted overthrow, and a lot of people were in on it. and they got c...

Campaign official surveilled by the fbi back in 2016. the report indicates an application known as fisa was approved in october of 2016 and given three separate extensions. while the applications were approved, inspector general michael horowitz found several glaring problems. at least 70 and errors or omissions in the speech and applications. an fbi attorney change the body of an email used to apply for the warrants. the fbi relied on the steele dossier for that page application. according to t...

Has not. the finding is that it was not political bias that led to the investigation of the relationships between the trump campaign and potential interference, now proven interference by the russians in 2016. i think that there are lots of people, we can talk about steel, we can talk about exactly why he acted in the way that he did, we can talk about clerical and clerical omissions that did not change or somehow leaves that document inaccurate as we presented to the court, all of that we can d...

Thats not mero saying that. that is professor turley. let me start with the best direct evidence of any potential quid pro quo or impeachable scheme. this is president trumps phone call with zelensky for which the national security council and the white house situation room staff prepared a call summary. according to testimony from tim morrison at the nsc the summary was accurate and complete. lieutenant colonel alexander vindman testified that any omissions were not significant and any editing ...

Trump campaign member and the question is, if i identify in my book, there were six misrepresentations to the fisa judging here they were deceived and they were vital eve withheld. the question is, was an intentional, which would be criminal, potentially, or was it reckless and sloppy errors and omissions and systemic failures? s spiel and those two things are the difference between being a deep state witch hunt and something i was sloppy. >> while there can be an agreement on conspiracy or ther...

Horowitz sharply criticizes fbi leaders after finding errors and omissions involving the surveillance of former trump campaign official carter page but ultimately found that the agents actions were not politically motivated. it is kbpted to debunk the theory that the fbi relied on information to open the investigation from the infamous steel dossier, a final version of the report is expected to be released on december 9th. the now infamous no quid pro quo call reportedly had between president tr...