Page 65 - Omissions News Today

Identified numerous errors and omissions in the pfizer application gets carter page. it even created a chart to track all of the mistake. some call the mistake, some call them mistakes but i wonder if they are just some coincidences. the deep state leaks this much, they know something big is about to happen. joining us now, you see this temple pick up "the new york times" and "washington post," but thats not a coincidence. where do you think this is actually coming from? >> what i think is there...

Because the facts are not on their side. no one disputes the elements of the story, so the only thing they have left is, a, to undermine the process or, b, it happened what are you going to do about it, or everybody does it. thats where were at and well see how it plays out. >> theres also news from the expected findings of the review of the russia that was conducted by michael harowitz. separately "the new york times" also reports that he also, quote, found that fbi leaders did not take politic...

Suggests that there is something of a mixed bag here that there is something in the report. there are a few findings in the report that president trump and his allies might cling to. so what are those exactly? >> look, there are a number of them. clearly there were some serious mistakes. errors and omissions made when putting together this wire tap application for surveillance on carter page, a former trump campaign adviser. there were serious mistakes there so lets not downplay that and also an...

Inspector general based on unnamed u.s. officials. these pieces say the i.g. is quite critical of the fbis handling of the early stages of the russia probe but does not view is it as tainted by pretty are call bias. errors in omissions in documents, sloppy and unprofessional behavior, a former low-level fbi lawyer who was forced out of the department may have altered a document connected to the surveillance of carter page, a trump campaign aide. howdying a story is this? >> i think -- how big of...

Say that the fbi, in particular its leadership, weaponized this surveillance tool, right, the fisa to spy on the trump campaign. what it does say is that while putting together the application to obtain this secret wiretap, they made a number of, you know, serious mistakes and omissions. it was basically unprofessionalism by the agents and officials and lawyers putting this thing together. >> what is the difference in this case between violations of procedures, serious though they may be, and wh...

Go ahead. >> well, one of the maintainingaways is the report doesnt say that the fbi in particular its leadership weaponized this surveillance tool, right, the fisa to spy on the trump campaign. what it does say is that while putting together the application to obtain this secret wiretap they made a number of, you know, serious mistakes, omissions, it was basically unprofessionalism by the agents and officials and lawyers putting this thing together. >> what is the difference in this case betwee...

Always altered. i mean, this is -- its just more of the same. i mean, this is exactly what they have been doing from the beginning, so i dont think theres -- >> well, i feel for -- >> much surprise there. but yeah. >> but i feel for you. i mean, it seems, as i say, look, im looking at the front page of todays "new york times," its the lead story above the fold, report is said to clear fbi of bias claims, but sloppiness is cited in russian inquiry. the sloppiness pertains to you. "errors and omis...

Ukranians understood asking a favor to be asking for investigations. the other thing that he told lawmakers is that mick mulvaney, the presidents chief staff, is now implicated in this quid pro quo because he was in touch with gordon sondland. sondland being the u.s. ambassador to the eu who has talked about there being this tradeoff asking ukranians for this investigation in order for them to get the security assistance that was on hold. the other thing that he says about that july 25th call is...

Over the past few months. the lawyers very specifically instruct witnesses that omissions are lies as well and those are prohibited. so im going to be interested in hearing ambassador sondland try to answer these questions about what he wouldnt admit or acknowledge in his private testimony. >> right. we didnt know about this other phone call we are learning about from first bill taylor and now holmes. but how much do people care? because people who are not already inclined to want impeachment, t...

Real signs people are rattled and not just as we tend to observe by what they stay but by what they do and then try to undo. take mitch mulvaney fames for going all mulvaney and retracting the omissions. today he had a lawsuit cooking he bailed on. but for a day he was attempting to join the bolton case and sue his own boss, president trump. so thats mulvaney jumping around. there are ereports president trump is shifting between relishing the fight and anger. anrgt new report has to do with the ...