Oneac Question News Today

>> tucker: it doesnt answer the question, i think i have a right to know which is why that happened? >> you dont have a right righo know. fbi investigations are confidential for a very important reasons including the protection of people who arent charged including for the protection of sources and information. you donhave a right to know. >> tucker: i would disagree with you completely and i know thatuc you are a former prosecur coming at this from a different point of view obviously. we know t...

Amendments, it is a preposterous closed room deal entirely drawn up by the speaker who is owned lock, stock, and barrel by k street, we know one. its not going to be in the favor of the american middle-class or american working families. indeed that is the hallmark for 20 years in the house. he works for k street. >> tucker: why the push to get this through? it seems like republicans can win this debate, the public is basically on the side of the administration on this question, why not run at? ...

Distinction between that and the email investigation which is over and an ongoing investigationnd where this confidential informant is very relevant. >> tucker: thank you for that, i apte it. house republicans make another push at immigration, are theyca yet another salve to the donor class? will get to the bottom of that question next. with it, i earn unlimited 2% cash back on everything i buy. everything. and that 2% cash back adds up to thousands of dollars each year... so i can keep growing ...

Up the sidewalks.rl then maybe we can get to the part about fixing the hole in the ozone layer. >> it doesnt have to be either or? >> tucker:k where the cities with the most open and aggressive commitment to the environment of the dirtiest? why is portland, oregon, a filthy place downtown. >> thats not necessarily true. >> tucker: have you been to portland? >> not all cities that are saying that we need to do better about our environment are filthy. where are you getting stat from? >> tucrack wi...

Redact these types of documents. if you look at the language that was uncovered by senator johnson and his staff, that material could not besidered classified under any definition. the question is why the committee has long accepted this type of conduct including democrats. if they can disagree with chairman nunez in the white house but they should all agree on the fact that this isnt a proper use of reduction. redaction. >> tucker: is not a new way of doingusiness. >> unfortunately it is, iv ou...

Quote stockholm syndrome. and how they did ehey could to avoringing charges nst any of clintons team. what is clear, is that nothing he said was a security threat that would require a reduction in order to protect the country. the doj was just trying to cover itself from keeping the public learning the truth about what was going on, is not a defense? jonathan turley is a professor at george washington university law school and he joins us tonight. its a very simple question, is the department of...