Over Stevenson News Today

Peace, and the other guy is a guy who never saw war and talks like a hawk, and i have a problem like that. romney talks about he has been to war, but he hasnt. am i right? h. >> well, the parallels are not even, but the point is that stevenson is much more eloquent than eisenhower and stevenson was much more admired by intellectuals than eisenhower and presidents come from different backgrounds and who would have guessed in 1860 that lincoln would end up being as eloquent and effective as he was...

And he listens to them well. and he asks them tough questions, and he is approaching this as methodically as anybody i know. you know, back in the 1950s, sam le bell one of the great political scientists of all time was at election night with a whole bunch of academics who were shocked that eisenhower won over stevenson and walked around the room and not a single person in the room had voted for eisenhower, and he said, guys, this is a sign of how big the gap is in america. >> i understand that....

Gingrich or be a nice guy and not be the nominee. >> he has assem bailed very smart group of people. and he listens to them well. and he asked them tough questions and hes approaching this as methodically as anybody. back in the 1950s, sam well abell was one of the great political scientists. was at election night with academics who were shocked eisenhower won over stevenson and walked around the room. not a single person in the room had voted for eisenhower. he said, this is a sign of how big t...

Political scientists of all time was at election night with a whole bunch of academics who were shocked that eisenhower won over stevenson and walked around the room and not a single person in the room had voted for eisenhower, and he said, guys, this is a sign of how big the gap is in america. >> i understand that. >> okay. mitt romney is a lot like eisenhower. he is a very good organizer and methodical person and prepared to systematically do what he thinks is right for the country, and i thin...

>> well, the parallels are not even, but the point is that stevenson is much more eloquent than eisenhower and stevenson was much more admired by intellectuals than eisenhower and presidents come from different backgrounds. who would have guessed in 1860 that lincoln would be eloquent and as effective as he was? >> you are saying it is a long shot? >> i am saying that you dont know today and he doesnt know today exactly what kind of president he will be. but you wont agree with this, but look at...