P Purview News Today

His son to cancel the meeting. He did not tell the fbi about the meeting. And if anything, he further encouraged and emboldened the russians to hack, because he went out just about a month and a half after the meeting and said, russia, if youre listening, which years ago from today, as you pointed out, you would be rewarded for hacking Hillary Clintons emails. Michael avenatti, after, represents Stormy Daniels said Michael Cohen has far more incriminating things about the president. I demanded r...

Responsibility. pursuing and investigating the president is within their p purview and they should pursue. if the talk of impeachment becomes the primary focus of the media, the public, at the expense, i think, of the issues that will end up defining this next election, which is health care, the economy, income inequality, guns, race issues, things i think people are focusing on more and more, you can do both. depends how you balance it. >> matt, pick up on that. you get a sense even though the ...

To do with russia and it is a federal crime and charged here and people pleaded to. thats a nonprosecution agreement. it was not in robert muellers p purview. they were involved in the manafort investigation. some aspects of that something that the office took a look into. they have the jurisdiction to look into the issues and thats why youre seeing this prosecuted in new york. here, how many other investigations and what else is going on? >> right. >> that has nothing to do with russia that inv...

Interconnected over the last year and a half since mueller took over the investigation and all of these new questions surfaced about what did donald trump jr. know? had he been fully disclosing information to the congressional committees? is he in sort of the -- the p purview of the special counsel? imagine waiting for your flight to take off that says so much about whats happening in washington. >> what i would give to be that lady sitting directly across from mueller. are these guys even ackno...

This evening that these members are thinking, why is he going so far off the rails on this particular question? and why is he, is he pretending that this is some sort of constitutional restriction on him, when its perfectly in the p purview of congress. they may assume he doesnt know that, but his reaction to it has very much marked, i think, the investigation, and helped set a certain attitude inside the senate about where trump is on this. and i think its made them more skeptical and much more...