complicit in evil if you have anything to do with judge kavanaugh. it could get crazy. they have forwarded the 911 records for his house hoping to find something. they found his car had been stolen a few years ago. they re going low. on the other hand, i think that judge kavanaugh is someone that is so articulate, so even-handed. so thoughtful in his opinions. i m looking forward to the american people get to see him for who he is and getting him to have the opportunity to talk about his dozen years on the court, all of the many opinions he s authored. i think we ll get a civics lesson like with justice gorsuch talking about the proper role of a judge and judge are interpreting the laws. it s the representatives that make the laws so they can get down and dirty with the policy arguments. judges are supposed to be interpreting the law that will be a breath of fresh air. charles: that is the big debate these days in legal circles. the constitution itself, should it evolve as opinions i
situation it s better than separating the child, better than separating the child. i mean, it is so bad. these little kids are going to sleep every night clinging to pictures of their parents. at some point we need to move from an abstract debate about policy arguments to taking into account these human consequences. and we have to balance heart and head here. we have to keep the facts straight. 75% show for the hearing. not don t show, 75% show, that means 25% do not, but that s being made into more. and for asylum seekers it s higher. so there was a program developed even more show up. right. it was developed called the case management program under the obama administration. trump got rid of it. it was ensuring almost 95% to 98% of people show up. we checked that. the community sponsorship program was cut some say because it was expensive, others say because they didn t want to motivate that, they wanted to get rid of them altogether.
bracelets. we hear the number is 75%. there s certain community programs, with sponsorship, get it over 90% and we ll show up. that s being used by the administration saying none of them show up. are you okay with people putting tracking bracelets on them? i think in an exteam are situation it s better than separating the child, better than separating the child. it s so bad. these little kids are going to sleep every night clinging to pictures of their parents. at some point we need to move from an abstract debate about policy arguments to taking into account these human consequences. and we have to balance heart and head here. 75% show for the hearing. that means 25% don t but that s being made into more. and for asylum seekers it s higher. even more show up. right. it was developed called the case
bill, that same bible verse we just heard him read was used to justify slavery. do you think sessions was aware of that? i don t know a lot of bible verses that have been used to justify a lot of things and one can cite a heck of a lot of bible verses from the hebrew bible and from the gospels, which is instructed to respect the poor to be kind of the poor, to be welcoming to strangers, and so forth. i don t think it s a very useful practice, honestly, to try to do that. i mean, i assume attorney general jeff sessions was being sincere here but let s have serious policy arguments and as scott said, this is not going to deter. it is cruel and inhumane. it needn t happen. we can have all kind of debates about immigration policy and the wall and what to do and some of these very difficult situations, the bush white house had difficult debates, the obama white house had difficult debates internally and in congress but they don t need to be separating these families and president trum
state. a merger, again he described being about cnn. the judge discussed the hallow nature of the government s case. holding the federal government is too thin a read for this court to rely on. the factual basis wasn t there, there was never got precedent for this kind of action despite the government s policy arguments. so, what was this about? here s my take, the most obnoxious part of this was the premise, too much power in the hands of too few. the president s assumption to that notion is defined by every move he s made in office. every autocrat he comprised. a tax that award the rich by simple . stripping regulation to allow big business to pollute and destroy others. his attack of the emergencier was never about keeping power from the few, it was about