russia collusionp 2016 campaign was a sham. john durham s conclusions weren t that brutal but his 306 page report was blunt and damning. after reading through as much of the report as i could stomach tonight i was disgusted. i was so sickened by what they did to donald trump, what the they did to carter page and so many others on the way. we see in black and white in facts presented what was obvious and pervasive corruption. now, there was clear political bias at work. durham calls it confirmation bias in the most powerful agencies in our federal government, intelligence and the fbi. now, hillary clinton we know she skated despite destroying evidence but donald trump? he was tormented over nothing. this began don t forget when obama was still in power. here s a tidbit on the steele dossier in footnote i love the footnotes 39. our investigators uncovered little evidence suggesting that prior to the submission of the first page fisa application the fbi had made any serious atte
Consensus reached after multiple days and meetings among officials. We reviewed Department Policies and concluded Assistant Director pre steps exercise of description in opening the investigation was in compliance with those policies. We also reviewed, as we detail in the report, the emails, Text Messages and other documents of those involved in that decision, particularly mr. Pre steps. We didnt find documentary or Testimonial Evidence that indicated political bias or improper motivation influencing his decision to open the investigation. While the information in the fbis possession at the time was limited, in light of the Throw Threshold established by department and fbi predication policy which, by the way, is not a legal requirement but a prudential one in the fbi and Department Policies, we found that Crossfire Hurricane was opened for an authorized
investigative purpose and with sufficient factual predication. This decision to open Crossfire Hurricane which involved the activitie
this began don t forget when obama was still in power. here s a tidbit on the steele dossier in footnote i love the footnotes 39. our investigators uncovered little evidence suggesting that prior to the submission of the first page fisa application the fbi had made any serious attempts to identify steele s primary subsource other than asking steele to disclose the identity of the sources. now, further on page 13 regarding the subsource, igor danchenko, danchenko was unable to provide any corroborating evidence to support the steele allegations and further, described his interactions with his subsources this is my favorite prime or and speculation. more over, notwithstanding the repeated assertions in the carter page fisa applications center field s subsource danchenko was based in russia. danchenko for many years had lived in wash!
The shadowy figure who funneled information to Christopher Steele for his notorious election year dossier is Igor Danchenko, a Ukraine-born, Russian-educated researcher who worked in the U.S. and traveled to Moscow to find supposed dirt on candidate Donald Trump.
Paul Sperry, Author at The Federalist thefederalist.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from thefederalist.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.