Page 836 - Processes News Today

Harm to the public and other neutral factors that are law and fact based, not political based. >> the president tweeted that this informant was actually spying on the campaign. u.s. officials are telling cnn that this was a confidential source not formally planted inside the campaign. is there a significant difference? >> well, i mean, spying is kind of a charged word. i dont think ive heard any reporting or suggestion from the white house that there was any actual wrongdoing. there are, again, ...

They use informants and have strict rules and protocols under this. >> so how far do president trumps powers extend for his department of justice demand? ken whaley is joining us right now to break it down. shes a former u.s. attorney, was a former correspondent with the whitewater investigation. kim, talk to us about the presidents power over the department of justice to make a demand like this. >> sure. the president under article 2 of the constitution has the power to take care that the laws ...

Keep digging at the story. >> you would think -- rebecca and i covered these presidential campaigns, that before a senior person in a campaign meets with a foreign official or somebody representing a foreign government, that person would go to the campaign council, the lawyer, and say, you know what, is this appropriate, is this legal and any problems? i suspect they didnt do it, meeting with the russians at trump tower in june or meeting with the emissary for the uae and the saudis in august. >...

>> a lot of the arguments he made in your book, loved your book. rebel, how to overthrow the oligarchy. so tell us the main argument. >> i think populism is a good thing. the problem is were told by the elite that populism is problem. the way the elite rigged the economy is what is the underlying problem. theres a number of parliament that after 12 years the political processes rigged by career politicians. i felt bad every month getting a paycheck from the taxpayer. i felt bad about as a libert...

Looking at how the f.b.i. started the investigation, what was it predicated upon, what information did they have and importantly, what processes were used? was it approved through a typical process to accompany counter espionage or criminal case? or was there a handshake and wink to say well treat this investigation differently? the process is what we dont know anything yet and we need to learn about in terms of using an informant, vetting the informant and following the process established for ...

>> a lot of the arguments he made in your book, loved your book. rebel, how to overthrow the oligarchy. so tell us the main argument. >> i think populism is a good thing. the problem is were told by the elite that populism is problem. the way the elite rigged the economy is what is the underlying problem. theres a number of parliament that after 12 years the political processes rigged by career politicians. i felt bad every month getting a paycheck from the taxpayer. i felt bad about as a libert...

To about 40 years worth of processes between the white house and law enforcement agencies where, to prevent an appearance of political meddling, federal law enforcement, administrations have afforded doing that sort of stuff. they want try to appear impartial, that the agencies act according to what they determine to be facts worsthy of inquiry. he has the power, i believe, but he shouldnt, i think, create an appearance that he is investigating or seeking others to investigate that which he thin...

Release these document they would be released. not just mark meadows and his caucus. the entire congress can hold the attorney general and rod rosenstein in contempt of congress. they can go to court. judge jeanine: you are still not answering the underlying question. why dont they respond to the committee which has oversight and control over them? why? who are they? chris: they made a claim not to reveal sources and methods. judge jeanine: baloney. there are processes involved, and i take that ...

Release these document they would be released. not just mark meadows and his caucus. the entire congress can hold the attorney general and rod rosenstein in contempt of congress. they can go to court. judge jeanine: you are still not answering the underlying question. why dont they respond to the committee which has oversight and control over them? why? who are they? chris: they made a claim not to reveal sources and methods. judge jeanine: baloney. there are processes involved, and i take that ...

Release these document they would be released. not just mark meadows and his caucus. the entire congress can hold the attorney general and rod rosenstein in contempt of congress. they can go to court. judge jeanine: you are still not answering the underlying question. why dont they respond to the committee which has oversight and control over them? why? who are they? chris: they made a claim not to reveal sources and methods. judge jeanine: baloney. there are processes involved, and i take that ...