Applicable to antiterrorism methods, i dont know. I think all of these models are heavily data driven. So one would need a lot of data. But to the point that these models, these predictive modelling are able to predict things that may relate indirectly to terrorism or criminal activities, the systems are suggesting that we are going that way. Other thoughts on that question . Theres a system in chicago that the Chicago Police department has deployed which both has been touted and criticized, but it does somewhat the neighborhood or block level predictive deprediction bs as to criminal activity as well as i understand individual level identifying people who may be either victims of crimes or perpetrators of crimes. Again, both touted and highly criticized. Any thoughts or comments . One quick one creating a feedback loop. You see every crime that occurs on corner acts and draw an overdrawn example that you thought it was real dangerous. Thats the main one from my perspective. So this is
Protected. Fourth amendment, mike, you talked about the balance between government requests and your customers privacy, do you think the government should have a warrant every time it accesses your customers records . Particularly if theyre american customers. Yeah. Certainly in the Law Enforcement context weve advocated for a reform of that that would in effect require a warrant for access to any content regardless of the age to precise location information, other sensitive data. You know, im not sure we gould so far to say that a warrant is required for every single case for every single data type. We certainly need to update the rules so that there is appropriate judicial review of surveillance programs and specific requests that we get for data. In terms of thirdparty doctrine, would you then essentially not have it be an absolute exception to the Fourth Amendment but essentially where would grow with it to provide some protection but not necessarily a full warrant protection . Yea
Congress. For example, the usa freedom act and similar initiatives. You have as part of that also the proposal to create an advocate of some kind,e. Here again, an attempt to influence or affect what are the rules that the intelligence agencies are expected to follow. And then a different part of that question is, what oversight mechani mechanisms, what assurances do we have that the agencies are following the rules . And you are part of that. I mentioned the congressional committees, and then all the layers within the executive blanche itself. So i think i hope that the public discussion has been shifting a bit from whether or not were following the rules i think what i perceived in the public discussion is a greater acceptance that where he in fact trying our best to follow the rules. Were not perfect and we make mistakes. But were trying to follow the rules as best we can. And now that the discussion has been shifting to what should those rules be . What are the rules . And what sho
Information on facebook or on twitter . So that the sharer becomes somewhat synonymous with a publishing brand. Thats exactly it. The sharer is becoming much more important than the actual source of the information. Do i trust this person . How do i feel about this person . If this is one of my most trusted friends and they post something, the chances i read that and think highly of it are greater than if its a person i met one drunken night in college and i friended accidentally. Right. Although they can actually lets talk about that. Can we talk more about that . Right. You know, pivoting to sort of media strategy, you guys have an extremely successful youtube channel. This is interesting because right now in media, as people are beginning to see that display advertising on regular articles doesnt necessarily scale terrific well, its difficult to have hyc pns, theyre turning to video as a savior. The trouble as i see it, in order to have margin, in order to make profit on video, you
Tell us a little bit about how we like to consume information . I think its really interesting because when you think about millennials, one of the sort of suppositions as you said is that its this generation that is, you know, unlike any just wants to do things online and when you think about the tactile experience of leafing through a magazine or print publication theres something about that experience thats about the sense of curiosity and a sense of seriousness that young want to consume their news with. Theres been a lot of assumptions to think this generation doesnt want serious content because were younger, not seeking that. In fact, this is a generation that cares deeply about the world, important issues that wants to be engaged with that. They want their experience to mirror that. While we enjoy going on a site like buzzfeed, there is a sense that we really do care about the world and want to consume that news in that kind of way. If you look at how everybody wants to consume