Awesome. Any other commissioner reports . Yes. I have been meeting with constituents in the merchant retailers that hold tobacco licenses and we are continuing to discuss our input for the health Code Amendment that raises the legal purchase age for tobacco. That will be continuing on to what commission was it on february 2nd . The health commission. The full health commission. So i report providing info and feedback on that as it moves and the participation from the merchant community. Great. And addition to the formula retail subsidiary conversation that is also on the radar for a lot of small corner merchants that also are scared of the target and walgreens mini mart phenomenon that may play into that conversation but hasnt really been voiced yet. Great. Commissioners, any other reports . All right, well, time for. Item no. 13 is general Public Comment. Do we have any members of the public that would like to comment on anything else today or to recommend anything for the future . Se
Entertainment and the bar uses, those use that is we see having a real potential for negative externalities and allowing bona fide restaurants that choose to serve hard liquor to the participate in the program. And no. 9, lastly, we have added in three more out of the ordinary uses uses we think just because of their nature should probably not be handled under the sb4p drive up facilities, fringe Financial Services and xwroupbd floor office uses that are closed to the public. Now, commissioners, because of the potentially widening scope here we are proposing that the sb4p be retitled and yes of course there is a new acronym to come with it, the Community Business priority processing program, slightly less wordy, the sb3p star wars acronym. Despite all of this, despite all these proposed changes, theres a lot of the program that remains intact, remains just as it has been. I want to focus on that for a second because we shouldnt lose track of that. The sb4p said the applicant conduct a
The sb3p star wars acronym. Despite all of this, despite all these proposed changes, theres a lot of the program that remains intact, remains just as it has been. I want to focus on that for a second because we shouldnt lose track of that. The sb4p said the applicant conduct a preapplication meeting with their neighbors. That worked and we have retained it. In a lot of these cases theres an extra preapplication meeting thrown in just to participate and we think thats a good thing. The same neighborhood notice that applied to sb4p previously and applies to every conditional ai plies here. The Planning Department must find the application is necessary or desirable. That doesnt change. And lastly the commission rule, the Planning Commission rule that any consent calendar item upon request by a member of the public or a commissioner automatically come off and automatically be put on the regular calendar. That rule is left unchanged as well. This last item is one of two checks on the progra
Out loud developed by the commission such that there are standards for the selection process. Is that your understanding of what we need to do . Seems to me that the last two we are going to have to sort of say meets a certain number of them but i dont think realistically that many businesses can do all of those things in those last two bullets. They may be missing one element there and i dont think that should exclude them. They are all quite significant. So i think we have to decide whether if they meet one then that. One of the two, or even in these two theres different elements so theres more than two. So i think we need to kind of think realistically woo a business would have been able to have done. What will be helpful, now that weve had some discussion, is if you can start articulating some thoughts and put them in writing to me and over the next week and a half so perhaps, say, by february 3rd if you could get then i can combine them. Yes. Please finish. I was going to say comb
Out loud developed by the commission such that there are standards for the selection process. Is that your understanding of what we need to do . Seems to me that the last two we are going to have to sort of say meets a certain number of them but i dont think realistically that many businesses can do all of those things in those last two bullets. They may be missing one element there and i dont think that should exclude them. They are all quite significant. So i think we have to decide whether if they meet one then that. One of the two, or even in these two theres different elements so theres more than two. So i think we need to kind of think realistically woo a business would have been able to have done. What will be helpful, now that weve had some discussion, is if you can start articulating some thoughts and put them in writing to me and over the next week and a half so perhaps, say, by february 3rd if you could get then i can combine them. Yes. Please finish. I was going to say comb