Years on a Fourth Avenue home in the richmond district. The hearing would address senior isolation and promote Better Living conditions for this population. If we profess to be an aging friendly city i think we need stronger systems in place to address senior isolation and also Mental Health support services especially for isolated seniors. I have been directly i have been directing our city departments and Community Agencies as much as i can to review services for seniors especially those living alone or isolated in their homes and at this hearing we would like to explore preventive measures that can be taken to address the issue of senior isolation and adequate Mental Health services for our rapidly aging population in San Francisco. I want to make sure that the communities are living or communities and residents are living in safe and sanitary conditions not only for themselves but the well being of the neighbors and other residents nearby. This hearing is part of my offices hard lo
Change the resolution. Sorry commissioner mondejar i have a few questions into two groups the certificate of preference are informing those displaced. Yes. Displaces like the one development they received the members of the how old are to receive a certificate of preference. Theres a lot of certificates of preference still preference and dr. Espanola jackson said its ending in 2016. If you look at package 8 of the certificate of Preference Program which is the attachment to the o to the mou it states that the certificates there are a variety of types but residential a or c certificates are valid until seven years after the completion of the project area like 2016 because i cant remember which project expired in 2005 but if this expires in 2008, im sorry. So basically that allows the Agency Commission to approve 5 year extensions to that project area no extensions. No extensions because nothing has expired yet. What happened if theres not used and expires and thats it. If no extensions
The general plan maps references those plan this plan goes to sunset to reference a special use district instead of the redevelopment plan and lastly the key changes that were introduced to the board of supervisors and the mayor i talked about the design for development those changes b are primarily in the special use district theres an open space master plan in your packet this plan has now been implemented and revised based on the transportation and that is in your package and the infrastructure map will be forth coming theres minor tweaks well have it to you and lastly theres a new participation agreement and ill im going to turn it over to emily and could be and wrap it up with the next steps good afternoon ken reminding i was the first planner on the project in 2009 im glad were finally getting it done back in 2012 it was posed to move forward and using the classic tools for a development to happen we lost those tools in 2012 unless the tools this site needed toxic remexico no sew
It was funded with tax increment and there was not enough to keep it high and third some unto to the map but its lower and we did this by grant some in kind credits against the fees youll hear more about this by securing small amazes from the city well detail those in a moment im going to turn it over to emily i want to remind you that all thats before you today are the authentication of the general plan amendment the rest is informationally information for your meeting in 3 welcome back im going to turn it over to emily thank you. Thank you, ken and good afternoon commissioner president wu and commissioners. We know that the commission is familiar its a illegal illegally bearing in mind be contract so along as they conform to the project. So the key tenants is the Development Program up to 6 hundred and 79 units of housing and retail. As well as the project phasing and a predetermined benefits the project any approve include a Grocery Store and parks and Affordable Housing and transpo
Days or within 60 delays e days like a project completion report and an annual report as theyre happening i dont want to wait until the end of the year and figure out what went right or wrong. Ongoing. I prefer more regularly reporting. I like that idea but instead of 45 days whats reasonable so we have two projects a month mabel need not be reasonable i want to reasonable number. We can look at that and see whether its 60 days or, you know, confer with most of the staff. The blank days of the completion and maybe an annual report which might be the same report given to us annually. Is this helpful and f 3 doesnt change the resolution. Sorry commissioner mondejar i have a few questions into two groups the certificate of preference are informing those displaced. Yes. Displaces like the one development they received the members of the how old are to receive a certificate of preference. Theres a lot of certificates of preference still preference and dr. Espanola jackson said its ending in