Ask mr. Updike which is what is the cost to the city if we dont do this . Is it possible there is another alternative plan for us that maybe more parsimonious . Thank you supervisor christensen. On the overhead i indicated some of the impacts to delay. We have 1 million in sunk costs related to the ceqa process which in the determination of public works is not transferable to a new site so that is specific to this site that is lost but more importantly is the escalation costs of the construction project. Overall this is a 165 million project, 16 million of which is allocated for the acquisition, so the estimate is if we had to secure a new site and go through ceqa for approval of the site and looking at cost to 7 15 million in inflationary costs of the project assuming the project did not have to be redesigned so thats a minimum expense for delay. Okay. Supervisor tang. Thank you. I think supervisor christensen posed one of the questions i was going to ask and the complications we have
Includes integrated automatic passenger counter and automatic announcements at the next stop at muni trains for above ground train stops in order for the ada compliance it will offer a better voice and communication data throughout the city for the major subways and tunnels that will have the good graphic System Design that the back up system could take case of the system failure it requires 40 radio transit sites throughout the city the other sites have been identified the proposed lease will cover the last necessary site for radio in the South West Quadrant of the city it will be used for radio transitioned and no city equipment 0 throughout the city it will have 3 options at the fixed rate a 25 year total if the options are exercised it is at fair market value at 66 per month with a slither increase flaunl on the Infrastructure Improvement including the electric and mechanic and providing emergency generators it is stimulated costs it will begin as soon as possible the lease is on a
Discussion on something i will be introducing a resolution on today which is the disappearance of the 43 students in mexico but its my pleasure to honor and welcome the renown mexican poet and activist here. I want to acknowledge him for his outstanding contributions to poetry, to international literature, environmentalism and human rights across the world. He has been elected twice president of the International Pen which he is now president emeritus. In 1985 he cofounded and chaired group los see an and a group of writers that included. [speaking spanish]. The group has called for the protection of the environment in mexico, latin america and the rest of the world. His most recent novel pictures mexicos current reality of violence, corruption and impunity and indifference and hes served as the ambassador to the netherlands and to switzerland and in paris. In 2000 he organized and presided over the earth in the year 2000 a joint International Pen symposium of writers and scientifics a
The Mission Bay Area and we actually threw that out and didnt approve it and wasnt the process and i will the developer bailed out as well if i recall. That was in 2010 so we didnt put the crime lab into that bond, that Public Safety bond in that year so we did in the following iteration which was last year. I think the process for this it makes mow really me really uncomfortable and the order and the appraisal and the lease, the Purchase Option agreement, that order of things done and the appraisal done and things done prospectively what the price could be years from now from the out set of the lease. It doesnt makence to have a up or down vote on and i am uncomfortable voting on this but i know there was a lot of work to put this together according to the cap tap plan according to have a new crime lab facility. We have been dealing with a facility that is inadequate for years, perhaps decades and now we have the opportunity to do that. We cant find the precious space for the crime la
Guess the concern about the 4 million is somewhat balanced by the question i would like to ask mr. Updike which is what is the cost to the city if we dont do this . Is it possible there is another alternative plan for us that maybe more parsimonious . Thank you supervisor christensen. On the overhead i indicated some of the impacts to delay. We have 1 million in sunk costs related to the ceqa process which in the determination of public works is not transferable to a new site so that is specific to this site that is lost but more importantly is the escalation costs of the construction project. Overall this is a 165 million project, 16 million of which is allocated for the acquisition, so the estimate is if we had to secure a new site and go through ceqa for approval of the site and looking at cost to 7 15 million in inflationary costs of the project assuming the project did not have to be redesigned so thats a minimum expense for delay. Okay. Supervisor tang. Thank you. I think supervi