Put Maliki News Today

And back in 2006, it was george w. bush who put maliki in office in the first place, so does bush bear the blame? richard clarke made a point earlier on in which he tells us what he thinks. >> fit werent for the american invasion of iraq, and the subsequent disbanding of the iraqi army by the united states, there would be no isis. isis is a direct outgrowth of the american invasion. >> but clarkes former colleague douglas feith sticks to his guns. if today, you knew what you knew back then about...

The influence necessary to dissuade prime minister maliki from the highly sectarian actions that he took. >> 10,000 troops, a plan to leave a force of that size had been floated in washington and baghdad. it was a plan that never came to fruition. >> i dont know whether 10,000 troops would have given us the leverage. i actually suspect it might not have, but i would have liked to have tested the proposition. >> it was never tested, some experts say because of prime minister maliki. they reported...

Troops would have given us the leverage. i actually suspect it might not have, but i would have liked to have tested the proposition. >> it was never tested, some experts say because of prime minister maliki. they reported that after iran made sure maliki was re-elected prime minister in 2010, maliki then turned around and did a favor for iran. he promised to expel all american forces before 2011 was over. now back in 2006, it was george w. bush who put maliki in office in the first place, so do...