Questioning Horowitz News Today

Weve got to look at for eight months e were doing this so i think following procedures is something you have to look at time is expired if he wishes. He doesnt wish. Good morning. The president who had no role in the white house asked you to deliver that message to Attorney General Sessions the president could have picked up the phone himself at any time and called the Attorney General. The president also had a full staff of executive employees right down the hall. So this made me wonder if the ...

Him through this committee for eight months. So i think following proceed sure is something that you have to look at because your idea is not really point of order. The time has expired. If he wishes. He doesnt wish. Good morning, mr mr. Lewandowski. Im questioning you right now. Thank you. The president asked you who had no role at all in the white house to deliver that message to Attorney General sessions. The president could have just picked up the phone himself at any time and called the Att...

Election. democrats want to ignore all the real evidence of russian interference and hold this fake impeachment because it happened under a different presidents watch. this all happened under president obamas watch. isnt that correct? >> yes, sir. >> and it was the obama administration that failed to protect us from the russian interference and influence in our election. isnt that also true? >> yes. >> president trump wasnt president. he wasnt the one that failed to protect the country. if anybo...

Asking questions after members of done. got the issue with consultants. this -- maybe we would be better served if we did exactly what mr. shabette said. better served at house judiciary committee if we actually focused how this whole false accusation started in the first place map do you think? >> a great idea. >> maybe the american people would be better served and spending more time investigating something thats already had 32 months of investigation from both comeyed fbi and special counsel....

Then had to shift and say, well, now its going to be impeachment by obstruction of justice. remember, they promised. they promised that special counsel mueller was going to breathe life into impeachment by obstruction of justice and instead put it to death. i dont know if you remember, but i asked him, give me an example only donald trump where the justice department determined that an investigated person was not exonerated because their innocence was not conclusively determined? his answer was,...

Fbi director who leaked the information to get the special counsel in the first place and the same inspector general who found that facts establishing that that same fbi director was in fact targeting donald trump at the same time in an investigation where he said he wasnt investigating donald trump. now, you might think that this committee would be interested in hearing from that inspector general for the first time rather than hearing from you for the fourth time. but maybe you can be helpful,...

And then theyve taken aim at jerry nadler saying theyre holding this hearing today, in fact, so he could call the inspector general, michael horowitz and have him testify about what he recently concluded that fbi james comey and coloring outside the lines in the handling of these memos that kick started the special counsel investigation. sort of a lot of drama, a lot of heat, not a lot of new information, except for that one detail from lewandowski that he said he didnt chicken out, rather he we...

Democrats want to ignore all of the real evidence of russian interference and hold this fake impeachment because it happened under a different presidents watch. this all happened under president obamas watch, isnt that correct? >> yes, sir. >> it was the obama administration that failed to protect us from the russian interference and influence in our election, isnt that also true? >> yes. >> president trump wasnt president. he wasnt the one that failed to protect the country. if anybody failed, ...

Are done. we got this whole issue with consultants. maybe we would be better served if we did exactly what mr. chapman said. maybe we would be better served as the white house judiciary committee if we focused on how this whole false accusation started in the first place. what do you think, mr. lewandowski? >> i think it would be a great idea. >> maybe the american people would be better served than spending more time investigating something thats already had 32 months of investigation from jim ...

The rules they changed last week talk about staff asking questions after members are dope we got this whole issue with consultants. so this may be we would be better served. if we exactly what mr. shabot said, as the house judiciary committee if we focused on how u this whole false b accusation started in the first place what do you think? >> i think it would be a great idea >> great idea. maybe the american people would be better served than spending more time investigating something thats had ...