Page 2 - Questioning Process News Today

Committed crimes. >> correct. >> will: yet. they are simply to this point people who had a relationship or alleged to have a relationship with jeffrey epstein. >> correct. people that were part of the questioning process in the 2015 defamation case. they simply were people that lawyers asked witnesses hey, did you ever hear anything about this person? the answer could have been no but their names still came up so they are in these documents. >> will: nate, thanks so much. >> you got it. >> truth...

More do we know about the police inquiries there?— inquiries there? well, mishal, we know that the _ inquiries there? well, mishal, we know that the authorities - inquiries there? well, mishal, we know that the authorities have i inquiries there? well, mishal, we i know that the authorities have been trying to find family members, including two pakistan —based brothers. we understand from local sources hear that those two brothers are due to appear in court tomorrow, and according to localjo...

>> chauvins many arguments before this court do not come close to justify a reversal. there was no abuse of discretion. nor actual prejudice. and to the contrary, the judge managed this trial with enormous care. >> reporter: and that was a reoccurring theme that you heard throughout the hearing. you also heard the defense, or excuse me, derek chauvins attorney come through and say there was one juror who wasnt completely honest during the questioning process, and you heard the defense come back ...

With much sadness, decided to resign as mp for north shropshire in the last two years have been in indescribable nightmare of his family and me. my integrity, which i hold very dear, has been repeatedly and publicly questioned. we will you more of that statement in a moment but lets go back to chris mason who is with us at westminster because chris, what is interesting is that there is no internalfiction here, isnt there? he wanted to clear his name —— and internalfiction. he wanted to clear...

A.m. pass is a door. she amended her statement to the fbi about this after mike flynn pleaded guilty to lying to the agents. >> clint, it must be a feeling, a singular feeling. youre the only one on the panel who has done this. represented the fbi and sat across civilians and started the questioning process reminding them that they had better be honest because youre an officer of the federal government. boy, i bet that focuses the mind. >> yeah. usually theyre nervous as soon as you show up espe...

And the why question. other people are involved in the communication with the russian a.m. pass is a door. she amended her statement to the fbi about this after mike flynn pleaded guilty to lying to the agents. >> clint, it must be a feeling, a singular feeling. youre the only one on the panel who has done this. represented the fbi and sat across civilians and started the questioning process reminding them that they had better be honest because youre an officer of the federal government. boy, i ...

Is mike flynn was completely irrational and lying for no good reason. i think that is still the big central question in this, why, and there are other people who we should remember, too, were involved in this communication with the russian ambassador during this period. im thinking of mike flynns deputy, k.t. mcfarland who amended her statement to the fbi about this after mike flynn pleaded guilty to lying to those agents. >> clint, it must be a feeling, a singular feeling, youre the only one on...

Dumb things have happened this week. but to say essentially that the work load is too tough for women to do it, when they are in the middle of a conversation about women and the fact that this is a guy who had to hire a female prosecutor to come in and question the woman accusing brett kavanaugh of sexual assault, because they didnt want it to reflect poorly on them if they questioned her aggressively, if they werent sensitive enough or just acted normal during the questioning process. because, ...

We have all the information already through the letters. i want to know the parameters and questioning process. >> again, the idea that this will all be limited and confined, if it was every true sunday morning seems less possible after "the new yorker" piece after another woman says she was sexually assaulted by brett kavanaugh. over the weekend there are people coming forward, including a woman who had been identified as somebody who had been at the party, and she said i dont know brett kavana...

Bias? >> absolutely not. i think they failed in their effort to do just that because they were trying to grandstand more than they were trying to do what the american people wanted, which is to hear the explanations of peter strzok. and when they tried to use the questioning process to simply further a particular narrative, whether it was favorable or not favorable to him -- had i been in a trial and i had done this very same thing, there would have been so many objections. let the witness actua...