Latest Breaking News On - Questioning process - Page 1 : vimarsana.com

yeah, it's it's it's been made a problem and the press was pointed out as being a source of that issue. >> i now of course, cnn has gone to great lengths to ensure that we are able to both preserve the opportunity for the public to understand the case and know about it and balanced against the anonymity reasons. but there's also a thing called prior restraint i know the judge wants to be able to say you've got to be very cautious about what you disclosed because i have a jury and a trial. we also one thing that you can't necessarily tell the press. you cannot publish something in advance. it's public knowledge information, but it's always been viewed as balancing test between what you can say in the public square and also preserving the right to a fair trial and that includes a jury who doesn't feel intimidated. the second juror who was sent home a santos by the judge after prosecutors raised concerns that he was not honest, did not disclose during the questioning process that 30, 70 thank was 33, 30 plus years ago, it had a conviction for tearing down political science. and he gave an interview that juror gave an interview with usa tonight's i saying he was surprised he was dismissed. he called mug shot a cowardly judge for lying. the problem prosecution to bring up in a restroom decade ago, he said, quote, i thought it was just an excuse for prosecutors

individuals, two have been dismissed, so we've got eight that will go through a more intense questioning process as they look to fill those other slots here. this is a moment for the defense team in which there's a reckoning that come monday we could be talking about opening statements and potentially the fist witnesses being called here. we were talking at one point about the jury selection process taking two weeks, so suddenly this weekend becomes all the more crucial for donald trump's legal team as they prep for for what could be a consequential first days out of the gate. >> vaughn, stand by, but do keep us posted if there's any major development. carol, let's talk about this other unresolved issue, which is the gag order and potential violations. yasmin mentioned that the d.a. is saying we count seven potential violations, talking about witnesses, trump's comments about the jury on immediate as well, the district attorney's office wants a thousand dollar fine for each of these violations. do you think that's going to be

they made it that far along in the process, and what i'd be interested in for both sides is what arguments are going to resonate with this jury? because everything leading up until now was more hypothetical in terms of arguments and case strategy, but now you have an audience, and so each side now wants to tailor their case to make arguments that resonate with the members of the jury and it seems like a well to do juror, jury that consists of people that productive members of society, maybe they don't pay such close attention to the cases that involve donald trump, and they haven't been paying that much close attention to this one but they're well informed. it looks like it's going to be a good jury on the surface. >> let me go back to vaughn, because i understand you have some new information about what's happening inside. >> reporter: we've got two additional alternate jurors there, so what we have left are two open slots, chris, with 12 individuals who have gone through the extensive questioning process here. so the question is are they able

in the courtroom just yet, but has been summoned to the courtroom. so again, we're still working to get what is going on there, but it does look like there's some more drama happening inside that courtroom this morning. kate, i think most definitely there's some more drama but there is a lot going on with the most important aspect that we're looking at right now is seeding a jury to get this trial going. brin keep us updated. la let me come back to the assistant district attorney talking about durer four. and this is common the commentary that was made during the questioning process that he believed he thought of donald trump is fascinating and mysterious. what do you see? what's going? what do you think of this well, now this is getting unusual. >> kate would have to jurors seated who you might lose or potentially might lose in the very first day after that. that is extraordinary. now, here's what happened. this juror for was seated. >> he went through the entire process. >> the judge said, i don't see any problems with his partiality. both sides elected

issues with a second juror. let's get the very latest from c in his branch and grass outside the courthouse, brynn yeah, john. >> so the issue is with juror number four, he is an older man from puerto rico as adult children and grandchildren and the questioning process that happened earlier this week, he said he found trump fascinating, but didn't really have strong political views. that's what we know about this person. what happened was apparently yesterday the district assistant district attorney notified the judge that there might be some issues with this juror that weren't exactly brought up in the questioning process. they found some possible arrests of someone of the same name and they wanted that to be addressed with the court. now, there's juror was some two the court to be here at 9:15 to speak with the judge and that person has not shown up yet, so it's unclear what's going to happen next the judges did offer to immediately strike this juror hurt juror, take them off the panel, but it

committed crimes. >> correct. >> will: yet. they are simply to this point people who had a relationship or alleged to have a relationship with jeffrey epstein. >> correct. people that were part of the questioning process in the 2015 defamation case. they simply were people that lawyers asked witnesses hey, did you ever hear anything about this person? the answer could have been no but their names still came up so they are in these documents. >> will: nate, thanks so much. >> you got it. >> truth is, we all know it, discrimination still exists in america. discrimination still exists in america discrimination still exists in america. we need to remember that diversity is our strength. we have to find a way forward. that's the work in my administration. >> will: apparently that so-called work costs at a minimum $16 million because that's how much the biden administration spent on brainwashing federal government employees with so-called dei training this past year joining

more do we know about the police inquiries there?— inquiries there? well, mishal, we know that the _ inquiries there? well, mishal, we know that the authorities - inquiries there? well, mishal, we know that the authorities have i inquiries there? well, mishal, we i know that the authorities have been trying to find family members, including two pakistan —based brothers. we understand from local sources hear that those two brothers are due to appear in court tomorrow, and according to localjournalists thatis and according to localjournalists that is because they are accusing the police of having illegally detained them during that questioning process. we have not been able to speak to the police today about it but when we last spoke to them the police confirmed that they were questioning them about denied that they had arrested those brothers. it has been incredible difficult to try to source information on the ground here in pakistan and to be able to verify a lot of this information because in this case the family aren't speaking to us, their lawyers won't speak to us and today we also had difficulty being able to get to the police to verify this as well. but we do know that the police in

>> chauvin's many arguments before this court do not come close to justify a reversal. there was no abuse of discretion. nor actual prejudice. and to the contrary, the judge managed this trial with enormous care. >> reporter: and that was a reoccurring theme that you heard throughout the hearing. you also heard the defense, or excuse me, derek chauvin's attorney come through and say there was one juror who wasn't completely honest during the questioning process, and you heard the defense come back and say, no, that was your job, that was the attorney's job to go through and ask specific questions during that process, and that if you didn't do that, that's on you, not on the entire system. one thing that is important to note here, hallie, is because derek chauvin also pled guilty in federal court, for the federal civil rights violations against george floyd, even if he wins this appeal, which legal experts say it is a high bar for him to do so, even if he wins this appeal, it is not that he

with much sadness, decided to resign as mp for north shropshire in the last two years have been in indescribable nightmare of his family and me. my integrity, which i hold very dear, has been repeatedly and publicly questioned. we will you more of that statement in a moment but let's go back to chris mason who is with us at westminster because chris, what is interesting is that there is no internalfiction here, isn't there? he wanted to clear his name —— and internalfiction. he wanted to clear his name, talks about integrity and now he is standing down so there will always be? over that and ijust wondered how much not anxiety but concern there had been about katherine stone, the commissioner, who had i think publicly or certainly been heard to say that she considered him to have been guilty before even starting the questioning process. yes, and that is what has prompted quite a lot of the concern for mr paterson and some of his conservative colleagues, but they didn't feel like there was a proper process ofjustice around his

Phải nhận thức đúng mới có biện pháp, cách làm sáng tạo, hiệu quả