1 that upheld a decision by the
Environmental Appeal Board (the
Board )
where an appeal was dismissed on the basis that the appellant,
Normtek Radiation Services Ltd.
(
Normtek ), lacked standing as it
failed to show that it was directly affected by the
administrative decision under review.
2 This is a significant decision by
the Court of Appeal as it potentially expands the test for standing
before the Board to include parties who s economic interests
may be affected even if not directly tied to an environmental
impact. In addition, this decision has the potential to expand the
scope of a hearing on the preliminary issue of standing before the