In 2006 and was commissioned as a military Intelligence Officer. He served as a squadron Intelligence Officer while deployed in iraq from 2007 to 2008 and as an assistant brigade Intelligence Officer while deployed in iraq in 2011. He is currently assigned to the United States military academy as a history instructor. His military awards and decorations include the bronze star with oak leaf cluster, the mere tore yous service medal. D he is abd from the university of texas at austin and working on a dissertation that examines the role of tom cy novels in the National Security policy of Ronald Reagan. His Research Interests include American Foreign relations and the cold war, ben hallcy, bachelor of science of u. S. History, a master of arts in interNational Security from the university of arizona, a master of history from the university of texas. In addition he is a National Security fellow at the Clements Center for National Security. He resides in west point, new york with his wife b
And had much stronger views about what should be done than and he thought that taft was just a little too much of a status quo guy. Yeah. Yes . Sometimes people think of the word pivotal as synonymous for the phrase turning point. Uhhuh. I was a little surprised you didnt mention that starting in 1932, democrats had a plurality or a majority in seven of the next nine president ial campaigns. Yeah. Starting in 1968, republicans had a plurality or a majority in five of the next six president ial campaigns. Uhhuh. And starting in 1992 democrats again had plurality or majority in five of the next six president ial campaigns. But thats not my question. My question really is, my question really is, is there something about substantial third Party Candidacies that exemplify pivotal election and should we expect this coming election will be pivotal only if there is a substantial thirdparty candidacy and probably not otherwise . Thats a thats a super question. I that is that is i hadnt thought
That we weigh in on how other countries set up their own regimes, in a manner that will be good for u. S. Firms and the u. S. Market. Its an attempt to influence what other countries do and thereby ensure a level Playing Field that works in our best interest. Their angst is based on the fact that they believe we might end up accepting standards from the International Community that might create problems for them here at home. Nothing thats adopted internationally has any binding force in the United States. We go through our own rulemaking process and decisionmaking. Its our internal decisions now. Of course, given our thoughts on whats appropriate, were using that and collaborating, doing this collaboratively with other u. S. Insurance regulators. Were presenting positions in basel, attempted to influence the international decisions. But we decide here whats the appropriate regime. Thank you, madam chair. Time of the gentleman has expired. The chair recognizes the gentleman from illino
Not look at asset manages of siffys but maybe down the road it would . There were a set of criteria that fsok initially issued to indicate firms that it might look at. Has that been updated, chair . Im not certain if it has. But there was there was written if you dont mind well reach out to your staff to see if theres any updated criteria on that. Do you also have a set of criteria that deals with an offramp, such as if an institution designated as a sify and they go down this path in your eyes, offramp for them. Do you have that set of criteria . We evaluate each of these firms every i think ivevery si decide if its no longer appropriate for them to be des designated . Do you have the guidelines . Were to the trying to run these businesses. And were not going to i dont think it would be appropriate for us to say you need to do x, y, and z to be dedesignated. These firms understand very well why theyve been designated. And they understand what kinds of changes in their Business Model w
She got sick again. When i went to visit her, she looked beautiful that day. Her head was shaved. She could not move but she had me put postits on every piece of furniture in the house and where they would go. She was part of the decision of what happened to her all the way through. You are robbed of being able to be part of what they do and when its time to say enough is enough. And if you are not offended by that, it is time that we all got offended together, but i stood by her. Cancer didnt run in my family. We need people who are not touched personally. If people sitting next to you a neighbor or you have someone that you feel so badly for, be their advocate. The care gave is the advocate on the front lines at the Doctors Office in the hospital, with the health insurers. Were wearing out. We need our kids. To be angry for us. If you look ahead, you see they say their future. We are robbing them of their future. So that to me is a huge issue. Join with us. I mean, i would really i h