rhetoric led: Live & Latest News Updates : Vimarsana.com
transfer of power for the first time in american history. it started well before he lost. >> they're going to try to steal the election. look at this crap. the only way they can win pennsylvania, frankly, is to cleat on the ballot. >> that rhetoric led his followers to a violent attempt to every enjoy throw the democratic process. in that famous speech at the ellipse earlier on january 6th, trump egged on a massive crowd of his supporters who have gathered in the nation's capitol to take action. >> after this, we'll walk down, i'll be there with you. we'll walk down to the capitol. you'll never take back our country with weakness. you have to show strength and you have to be strong. >> we fight like hell. if you don't fight like hell, you won't have a country anymore. >> the outcome of trump supporters fighting like hell on january 6th was broadcast to the world. the violent mob smashed through
even lost. >> they're going to try and steal the election. look at this crap. the only way they can win pennsylvania frankly is to cheat on the ballot. >> that rhetoric led his followers to a violent attempt to overthrow the democratic process in that infamous speech on the ellipse earlier in the day on january 6th. trump egged on a massive crowd of his supporters to take action. >> and after this, we're going to walk down, and i'll be there with you, we're going to walk down to the capitol. you'll never take back our country with weakness. you have to show strength and you have to be strong. we fight like hell and if you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country anymore. >> the outcome of trump supporters fighting like hell on january 6th was broadcast to the world. violent mob smashed through barriers and brutally injured dozens of police officers. nine americans died including
>> of the former president, myself, one of us is a lifelong republican. one of us will always support the republican nominee. >> but is he a lifelong republican? >> no, that's me, mika. >> i think i got your answer. >> willie, take it. that's fine. good job. >> do you remember the day -- there was a day when bloomberg was a republican and trump was a democrat, right? i mean, that wasn't that long ago. it's crazy. >> i know, i know. i hear ya. i hear ya. i got the answer, too, willie. >> governor, a lot of people are trying to wish donald trump away, and i understand what you're saying there. but the reality is, he's still a force in the party. so help us understand, and i mean this totally sincerely, because you're not alone in this position, which is, you've said he contributed to the insurrection. his rhetoric led those people to the capitol on january 6th. shaking the foundations of democracy. thankfully it held. yet, if he did become the nominee, you would support him.
trump's rhetoric led to the storming of the capitol, even though we just had the january 6th that said it did. you said that in -- okay, you questioned the election itself. you voted against impeachment. you voted against creating an independent commission for the january 6th account. on voting laws, you voted -- you defend voting laws that said getting rid of ballot harvesting is a good thing, so you defended the florida voting laws. >> they have the best election laws in the country. florida laws are the best election laws in the country. we do it the best. >> all right, and you have defended and actually have cosponsored two pieces of legislation opposing critical race theory. what is critical race theory in your view? >> critical race theory comes from critical theory. and essentially what it does at the graduate level, it talks about the implications of racial policies in the past, their impact on society today. hold on, the issue with critical race theory if you distill it
and then it moves to podcasts, and then suddenly it is coming out of politicians, like marjorie taylor green, or lauren boebert's mouth. and people do this for money and political clout, and all sorts of reasons but it has real world effects. and we've done this so many times, right? we talked about it in 2019, anti-immigrant rhetoric led to many shootings, mass shootings, people died in el paso at walmart, anti-semitic online hate speech leads to a mass shooting in a synagogue, we have seen this as well. and this keeps happening and we keep finding out after the fact that this has happened and the shooter's main motivation, we don't know right now but it feels very familiar. we read the sort of plan festos so many times, and the idea now that the people spreading this online rhetoric, that are demonizing, dehumanizing lbgtq folks, calling them gloomers and pedophiles, and the people who
knows what that might bring if the president that is willing to try to and still -- and encourage, to whip up a civil war amongst his own followers using lies and deceit, using snake oil, this is regardless of the human impact, what else is he going to do if he gets elected again? >> what else indeed. every day now we are learning that january six was where is that we originally thought. donald trump's rhetoric led to his white supremacist followers becoming domestic terrorists that ultimately became a huge threat to our country. a former member of that group was part of the insurrection. they are warning there could be more violence ahead of trump runs again in 2024. rumors say that he is definitely running. he says he has already made the decision, it is now just a matter of when he will announce
top diplomat repeating the false claim that it is trying to denazify ukraine shrugs off the fact that ukraine's president is jewish and makes an absurd assertion. >> he makes an argument which is what kind of nazification they have if he is a jew. i could be wrong but i think hitler also was a jew. they said the words were untrue and the intentions are wrong. the chairman of the holocaust memorial called the remark false and despicable. >> he is basically engaging in holocaust inversion, making the victims of the holocaust the perpetrators. and that is inexcusable. >> reporter: analysts say it is part of a dangerous pattern of twisted russian rhetoric led by putin since the war began, smearing ukraine's leaders. >> translator: this gang of drug addicts and neo-nazi that's has settled in kyiv and taken hostage the entire ukraine
>> and of course here in washington where you've heard most of this rhetoric, anti-police rhetoric led to, clearly led to violence in this country, the people that are spouting this rhetoric are all protected. they have guards, they have their own special police force that protects them. they do not face the front end of the crime the way regular normal citizens do, and i have to say there are two things that change elections, that force massive change elections. one of them is economics, personal economics, and the other is personal safety. and when you see that sort of blythe dismissiveness, like jen psaki, that leads to massive changes in electoral politics. >> sandra: and she's welcome to come back and tell us where she stands on, we have an open invitation, fox does not have a seat in the room, we'll see if
eye-opening awakening for him. >> he took it personally as someone who was beaten up during the insurrection. he took it personally when mitch mcconnell was asking for a personal favor to vote against the insurrection. that really came through p. disgraceful. yeah. >> he also during this interview, which was fascinating. i stayed up, watched the whole thing. like an hour before i have to wake up. you also talked about michael flynn and what michael flynn has been saying in his response to whether or not he believes there should be a myanmar-style coup in the united states. seeming to endorse the idea of a coup here. fanone told you he absolutely thinks could lead to more violence here. >> they are concerned about more violence. and he said directly, i know that this rhetoric led to the violence that happened on january 6th. and of course i'm concerned about it because people are not living in reality. and you still have people on capitol hill now who are somehow trying to minimize what happened
supremacists, that's not true, we have to be very clear but one call out socialism for what it is and call out white supremacy and racism when we see it and hear it, what made this past week coverage so hard is republicans were so -- they had a hard time calling the president out for his rhetoric and what his rhetoric led to. >> and the important thing not to make disagreeing with liberal policies white nationalism. >> but when you see white nationalism you have to speak out on it. >> i was struck by beto o'rourke sort of chiding the press for not agreeing with him. great discussion both segments richard fowler, gillian turner and mollie hemingway. prosecutors ramp up jeff bezos allegation that is the national inquirer blackmailed him, some calling president trump accessory to mass murder, how much of this is driven by ancestrydna has new features and richer stories.