Rightt Bill News Today

Democratic party on the house intel committee to agree with you, congressman? that this has to be done in a way thats methodical to the american people know the truth or do you expect obstruction? >> i think there will be some obstruction. they will accuse us of trying to deflect the issue away from russia. we are going to go ahead with it. we have to go ahead with it. to me, im one of those that believes we have to examine the russia issue as far as we possibly can and also this. right now to m...

Information go after it was unmasked. >> bill: one more question to you, congressman. every morning the white house gets a briefing from the intel agencies. have you ever heard of national security advisor taking this kind of an interest for more than a year in a campaign or a transition or anything like that?t? you have been around for a while. have you ever heard of anything like that? >> bill, i think its very unusual for a national security advisor to take this type of interest at all. may h...

This is the same accusations flying around with the irs, for instance, that the irs was using their tools for political purposes to be able to silent conservatives. if we get close to the campaign time period and they are using official documents, classified documents at that to either release names thats obviously a legal issue, to target individuals that are american citizens that were masked, thats called reverse targeting. but when you say you are targeting people internationally but actuall...

>> bill: "back of the book" segment tonight, what the heck just happened? as can you imagine,>> the left is not happy about the susan rice/trump surveillance deal. >> president trump wants you to believe he is the victim of a crooked scheme those are his words. here are our words. there is no evidence of any wrongdoing. >> people do have power to unmask those names. susan rice would have been one of them. there is no big bombshell there. names can be unmasked if there is a counter intelligence i...

She does have a history there. but i dont know if thats. -- if we should prejudge. >> im not prejudging.g. im just saying when you are factor in everything you consider prior statements and prior conduct. >> bill: and thats true. gentlemen, thank you very much. please keep us posted. if you get anything, please let us know. our audience is very, very interested in this story. >> thank you, bill. thank you, senator. >> bill: directly ahead, no doubt partisan politics also impacts the investigatio...

And civil rights situation. well tell you whats going on. caution, you are about to enter the "no spin zone."" "the factor" begins right now. >> bill: hi, im bill oreilly. thanks for watching us tonight. the trump surveillance story explodes. that is the subject of this evenings "talking points" memo. tonight we will give you just the facts. no speculation, no hysteria. the latest from fox news correspondents adam housley and malia zimmerman is this: "multiple sources tell fox news rice requeste...

Unmask the names of people involved in the trump transition? trump campaign. people surrounding the president-elect? >> let me be clear.. >> in order to spy on them? >> absolutely not for any political purposes to spy, expose, anything. >> did you leak the name of mike flynn? >> i leaked nothing toid nobody. >> bill: nothing to nobody should be nothing to anyone. now, heres my question. if susan rice did surveil the trump people, big if, for a year, what was her motive? why did she do it? i mean...

This evening. as always, thanks for being with us. see you back here tomorrow nigh night. ♪ >> bill: "the oreilly factor" is on tonight. >> i leaked nothing to nobody and never have and never would. >> bill: former national security advisor under o president obama susan rice denied any wrongdoing in surveying donald trump and his associates. however, fox news is reporting that ambassador rice was deeplyru involved. we will give you the facts tonight. >> the facts will come out with susan rice ...

Members and possibly even his campaign members. we have to think about this in terms of this was going on for at least a year, according to our sources, possibly longer. >> bill: well, let me stop you there. if it was going on for a year, then it had to be the trump campaign people. so, look, the questions you raise are the same questions i raise. motivation. all right. t we dont know why susan rice r took such an avid interest in this. the extent. so, let me ask you some very simple questions b...

Pull as many people out as we can to get their personal testimony. let the facts lead us through it not let bipartisan pull us through it. >> bill: a lot of people disagree with me that shell take the fifth but i think she will. senator, when you heard her on march 22nd, said she didnt know anything about any trump surveillance and then changed a little bit, a nuances that, yeah, i was interested for this reason, telling msnbc that did that raise anything or do you think thats a natural answer? ...