turn out to be a real game-changers on both the democratic and the republican side. there is no question that having jill biden swing behind the continuation of a biden administration, a biden presidency is major within the white house. because she s been reluctant, it s been hard in many ways, it s been hard on her. but i think with the midterms they realize we have a real shot at winning this, the presidency. and she regarded as the best judge of his health and if she s this far over as reporting would suggest that she s as enthusiastic as she is because she thinks he s in pretty good shape and she s got a ring-side seat. she does. some of the reporting is they felt the wind was at his back at this point. she has a ring side seat but also a major player. it is the first lady running as
stood for. sometimes it made it unpopular, but he always did it. and i think that is a lasting legacy. also, jaums as a senator, as a presidential candidate, the republican now knee in 2008, he had a ring side seat to the populism that was growing in this country. and in many ways he was contributing in some ways to it by elevating sarah palin who was a ka facanary in the coal mine trump. i guarantee you that statement written by george w. bush was not hard for him to write. it was easy for him to come up
said something to him about flynn and the president denies he ever said that about flynn. well, what if, what if there is someone else in the white house who can actually confirm that the president did say something like what jim comey says the president said? yeah, lawrence. you re absolutely right. this is a key thing. the hardest part of proving the case is proving what the president did was with an intent to obstruct justice, to impede the investigation. and don mcgahn had a ring side seat for that intent and was involved in these various acts that trump did: firing comey, demanding that mueller be fired and actions taken against rosensterose rosenste rosenstein. if you take a step back, you have got a white house counsel now talking to prosecutors. you have got someone running around that taped the west wing. you have a president with an enemy s list. we are a few away from a re-make of the 1970s.
case is proving what the president did was with an intent to obstruct justice, to impede the investigation. and don mcgahn had a ring side seat for that intent and was involved in these various acts that trump did: firing comey, demanding that mueller be fired and actions taken against rosenstein. if you take a step back, you have got a white house counsel now talking to prosecutors. you have got someone running around that taped the west wing. you have a president with an enemy s list. we are a few away from a re-make of the 1970s. this looks like the nixon white house all over again. i want to go to something the president said in an interview with routers today. and the president arranged this interview. i think it is fair for us to consider that it might have been arranged in direct response to the new york times reporting
those people he met with right up to meet his father. i don t know if that s true. but i find it very hard to believe that at least the president s son didn t share that that meeting was going to take place, what the purpose of that meeting was, and what happened after the fact. very hard to imagine that given the significance of that meeting and what they were trying to accomplish, get dirt on hillary clinton, he didn t share that with his father. congressman, jeremy bash has a question for you. if steve bannon does appear before the committee and i under you re not confirming who will be before the committee but if you have an opportunity to question him will you ask him about what the president did in term of the decision to fire jim comey, the obstruction question that bob mueller is also investigating? given the role that mr. bannon played in the campaign and, again, in the administration, it s pretty easy to imagine that he had a ring side seat to what took place so that s