with whether or not whether ore not roe v. wade and this is what conservatives often believed constitutionalists have believed originaliststu hae believed is that it enumerated a right that did not exist within the constitution. what s interesting aboutn. this is the draft opinion, unflinching repudiation of the seventy three decision guaranteeing a federaler constitutional protection on abortionalon rights as they report in politico, planned parenthood versus caseyca that largely maintainn that right. s report i if this report is true , justice alito writes roe washe egregiously wrong from the start and we hold that roehe and casey must be overruled. he writes in the documentt labeled quote opinion of the court it is time to heed the constitution, return the issue of abortion to the people s the elected representatives. that s where the issue of th comes intoosophy
we holdsi that role. casey must be overruled. this time to heed the constitution, return the issue of abortion to the people s elected representatives. there s been i have a lot of skepticism, although i do find professor dershowitz his theory very fascinating, interesting,l, plausible all the above. so i really don t know what to tell this audience, but i don t think anybody does know. what s your reaction too the? the political article? my reaction is, is that the draft sean, is a lot like justice alito. clerks at that court have litigateded at thatt that courtg this leaked opinion tonight . and i think t legitimate this to me and there are details in this that would be very hardr to know details in the reporting about when the justices votedep, how they voted at conference. it s pretty hard to makeut of that up out of whole cloth. di and there areca all kinds of indicators here that it sounds like somebody who who reallyl does know and i could tellyo you there s a small universe o
play. do you enumerate a right? not specifically enumerate spelt in the constitution or should it be up tohe the states which s what conservatives have always argued deliberations on controversial cases have in the past been fluid. justices t can sometimes do change their votes and opinionsa as opinions are circulated among the different supremereur court justices. major decisionsma can be subject to multiple draftsti training sometimes until just days before the decision is unveiled . but the real heart of alito s words if in fact this remains the final decision would be roe was egregiously wrong fromre the start. its reasoning was exceptionally weak and the decisionpt has had damaging consequences. and far from bringing about a national settlement of the abortion issue, roert ioand casey have inflamed debate and deepened division in this countryy. ify we look at what they were reporting, a person familiar t
0 naturall constituency, the pictures of the internet. you ll noticee the servants of color in the background had to remain mass . cover your face, sir, if that s seems hypocritical view, what s your science? that s it forence. us tonight.. we ll be back eight pm following every weeknight upsilon and welcome to hannity. all right.we we begin with news just this minuteht nowow and we start with a fox newsew alert now according to a breaking news report from politico, the u.s. supreme court has in fact voted to overturn roe versus wade. if this report turns out to be true, abortion will now be regulated at the state level, meaning it is not going to be illegal probably in most states in the united states they ll be very restrictions. o one of the biggest issues involving this case has to do with whether or not whether ore not roe v. wade and this is what conservatives often believed constitutionalists have believed originaliststu hae believed is that it enumerated a right that did not ex