song i i m going to give you a short odds that it s likelyg his writing from a first draft doesn t mean that s how it ends a second a decision that reflected largely what is in that draft would be aar glorious thing forgedr the unitd states ofst america. it was in the first instance be a return to constitutional judging. right. we s have a series of justices returning to our foundational rootss, wiping off the books, something that even liberal justices understooddus made no real sense. they had to defend it because of their own views on abortionie .ce j but this is a good piece ofonstl judging, a good piece of constitutional work if it isn t the way that this draft appears to be heading a second state, we ll get to sort this out.at that s the right place for this to be sorted out. but i am also optimisticre that when these rights are returned to people all across america that we will save lives, save lives off the unborn all across this country and that would make a decision along the
senator ted kennedy against robertte bork lies that he told about robert bork in the days ahead, especially if this decision does come down this way. rn ari, lookingor forward, g toood your book. j a governor good to see you, joe . always good tooe have., tod joining us now, former n secretary of state mike pompeomp is with us. you went to west point. you graduated one or twor in your class. . i don t remember. i forget. forgive me. i still love you. also but but you re also an attorney and some people might not a know that . so add that to a list of incredible credentialsed and secretary of state, i d love to get your thoughts generally on number one , the report. do youse take it seriously? do you think does it seem legitimate to you and what it would mean if in fact this were the final decision which i ve read about the first two thirds of it now it reads liket a writing of a first draft from someone who believes deeply in the united states dtes constitution in the very wayay that i
with whether or not whether ore not roe v. wade and this is what conservatives often believed constitutionalists have believed originaliststu hae believed is that it enumerated a right that did not exist within the constitution. what s interesting aboutn. this is the draft opinion, unflinching repudiation of the seventy three decision guaranteeing a federaler constitutional protection on abortionalon rights as they report in politico, planned parenthood versus caseyca that largely maintainn that right. s report i if this report is true , justice alito writes roe washe egregiously wrong from the start and we hold that roehe and casey must be overruled. he writes in the documentt labeled quote opinion of the court it is time to heed the constitution, return the issue of abortion to the people s the elected representatives. that s where the issue of th comes intoosophy
ra it s clearly a draft. it s not finalized. but hopefully it is true . you know, there is no constitutional right to s abortion. this should go back to the statesac where i should have been. and so i think this is w a liberal who is againstho this and they are throwing away their entire career to leak a this opinion and they will be able to findbl out who it is. i ve been trying quickly to s look through the federal statute and seeta if i can find any crime that would be attached to it and i can t so far there may be , but at that level of practicing law,a as a supreme court law clerk, it s unbelievable that someone is throwing their career out t the windowow ashanti s that they will be disbarred and i believe justice roberts and the rest of the justices will find out who it is. it s so easy to track things now, especially that opinion was not out there publiclyll,
clear this is unacceptable when they pay a real price. the times have w changed certainly in washington, the issue of privacy interestingly i don t i wouldrg argue doesn t exist in america ,especially for conservatives. mr. secretary, always good to have you. thank you for being with us.. the all right. thank you for the very latest from the u.s. supreme court. isis fox news at night host our own shannon bream. ng that may shannon, i m sensing that maybe you talk tobe a few people since you were just on . what did you learn?h. i am increasingly convinced that at some point this was a draft that was circulated within the court again, what eventually ends up being voted on , signed off on release from a court official opinion could be wildly different than what i m holdingldin my hands rt now. being but at some point this was being circulated at the court for consideration. and as we talked about,abou this what justices do.he they trade this stuff back and forth. they modify opinions.