Being tested like never before. That, combined with populist and over thest forces all world, including here in the United States means what we tend to expect of the International Order is now open to question. Given the history of johns ,opkins and its establishment we might once again reshape international affairs. Continuesmpensation an enduring tradition of. Ialogue on the study of china we have long understood and the importance of chinas relationships around the world, and especially its relationships with the United States. Since the center opened its doors in 1986, we have shaped of u. S. Chinaades relations through our alumni, who have gone on to be global leaders. The scholarship of our esteemed leaders on china has influenced government and the private sector and we are privileged to be hearing from some of them today. Joining the Panel Discussion will be our own professor david he isthe director one of the leading scholars of china today and many institutions have benefited
Im used to antiamericanism on the right in britain. Ive seene first time it on the right in germany. Ilk, mostlyame cultural. These people are crass, kind of bumbling, and by the way theyre trying to sell us a form of capitalism and regulation that inferior to the one we have, that was new to me. Romance withous putin. Still with putin, for all the germany. In let me suggest a theme and move onto another them. Sustaining,eme be defending the liberal International World order . Rightt whats at question now, whether or not thats going to happen in the coming generation . A new task forn the Transatlantic Community . All those words are so loaded, that im not sure id subject describe to them immediately. But building, maybe its sustaining,her than an order that is both tolderrably acceptable to us and to the chinese, for instance. Middable the afternoon and thats what the future order has got to look like. Movement onen chinas part in the right direction, but a long way to go. Trying, tha
For a living wage. You wouldnt have to have legislation about minimum wage if you werent bringing in millions of people illegal and ausing them to compete with people that are trying desperately to find jobs, doing everything they can to find jobs. But we also know that for the First Time Since president carter, over 90 million over 16 Million People who could work, are not looking anymore. With this new five Million People the president is all of a sudden with the stroke of his wand, all of a sudden taken from illegal status to legal status and heres your work papers, all of that is illegal. But hes done it. Which should ultimately drive another five Million People out and either onto food stamps, onto welfare, so if the president s been upset about being tied so much of this year with jimmy carters numbers, over 92 Million People not even looking for work anymore, given up hope, he wont have to worry about that, hell be in a league all his own once he puts an additional five million
Contracts in foreign countries, and they would have affects like places in this town in ohio, but what the town in ohio does and how they chart their Economic Future its something you have to do forever. You have to have a strategy. Whiffs governor, i suppose he spent more time on Economic Development than anything else. The mississippi debta was the second part of the time after the indian reservations. There was a county in southeast arkansas, with two towns about the same size. One of them had 12 unemployment rate. The other had a 4 unemployment rate. Same socioeconomic incentive because there were all these gogetters in the 4 town that just kept redefining the mission and kept finding new possibilities and kept trying to make those possibilities. Since you lost all those jobs. Became very worried in my second term that the empowerment zones and all that stuff was great. Harlem got an empowerment zone, and their unemployment was 24 when i took office an 8 . Detroit got an empowermen
The United States. Three lines to chime in. If you support it, tell us why 53880. If you oppose it, 2025853881. If you are not sure. 2025853882. cspanwj. R is you can reach out to us on facebook. Our email is journal cspan. Org. The New York Times writes about the statements made yesterday at the white house. President obama is asking for the review of the Death Penalty. The story goes on to read your thoughts on the death as a result of this call for a view by president obama. Three lines for you to choose this morning. President obama made these comments yesterday during that joint appearance with angela merkel, the german chancellor prieto here are hits german chancellor. Are his thoughts. [video clip] the individual that was subject to the Death Penalty committed heinous crimes. I said in the past there are certain circumstances in which a that theso terrible application of the Death Penalty may be appropriate. Mass killings, the killing of but i have also said that in the applicat