others, to delete the security footage. there is no reason for you to delete the security footage if you didn t think you did anything wrong. and so the prosecutors want to be able to use that to tell the story to the jury that will make sense. what stuck out to me a lot in here, is page 29 in this indictment. page 29 is everything. painfully nine is everything. this has the details of this conversation and the rto closet. it doesn t have trump, though, his audio recording, it has this implication that trump wanted this to happen. so how, in a court of law, do you prove it? do they need one of these? it seems clear that employee 4 here may be working with jack smith s team. is that your belief as well? i think that s an implication. he turned over text messages. it s not clear whether there is another wire or other recording in that little closet room. they didn t get the. audio it s so detailed. it s not an exact
in here, is page 29 in this indictment. page 29 is everything. painfully nine is everything. this has the details of this conversation and the rto closet. it doesn t have trump, though, his audio recording, it has this implication that trump wanted this to happen. so how, in a court of law, do you prove it? do they need one of these? it seems clear that employee 4 here may be working with jack smith s team. is that your belief as well? i think that s an implication. he turned over text messages. it s not clear whether there is another wire or other recording in that little closet room. they didn t get the. audio it s so detailed. it s not an exact transcription. but it would be a lot for employee 4, the i. t. director, to remember all this by memory, and obviously prosecutors want to be able to back it up. they re going to need to be able to put someone on the witness stand to ascend to kate