Page 2 - Sat Question News Today

To answer. and his answer is obtuse. it is kind of never -- an s.a.t. question, never, ever, all and any. any of those declarative statements and i think hes leaving the door open just in case. >> just a red flag, dont you think? >> i just feel like all of this is more about rudy giuliani than anything else. >> really? >> i think this is sort of he thinks this is normal. the way hes been saying -- even when he was talking about paying people off that of course this is what cohen does because thi...

Really, we are talking about the suitability of the people that they have put into these positions. thats whats at question. >> but, you know, once someone of these people who hasnt received this clearance but is able to see classified information you cant unsee classified information, right? the toothpaste is out of the tube. garrett -- or nada, isnt part of the point to get the clearance before you see secrets? >> absolutely. i had to jump through many hoops to get my top secret clearance and ...

About. at question is whether the president will discuss the russian interference back in the 2016 elections. and whether hes boxed in by the federal investigation into russian meddling to make progress in any of those relations. now president putins foreign affairs adviser has said that the battle against terrorism and the conflicts in syria and ukraine are likely subject of discussion. another topic thats important for putin, return of the russian compounds in new york and maryland. they were ...

Impea impeachment. but in 1998, bill clinton remained in office after being impeached at the white house and acquitted by the senate. at question were his statement. >> announcer: oath when he tried to cover up his affair with monica lewinsky as part of the white water investigation. joining us now is barbara kellerman, lecturer at the harvard kennedy school. thanks for being with us today, barbara. >> my pleasure. >> youre saying what were missing here is the context were focusing on too much o...

Did you or did you not advise the president of what james comey claims he was saying this shouldnt happen, these meetings, these discussions? >> thats right. and of course james comey testified that jeff sessions did not respond or did not reply to that. no the justice department has put out a statement arguing with that saying that sessions did in fact talk about how it was important that the justice department would be careful in managing these interactions. to me, the broader question here is...

To pledge allegiance. who would do that? >> president trump there disputing the testimony of former fbi director james comey on friday. the question of whether hell testify is a debate and theres no question that his attorney general will. jeff sessions will go before the senate intelligence committee. he could support ore undermine comeys testimony no doubt. that hearing is expected to take place behind closed doors as nbcs kelly odonnell has been telling us. for more, were joined by republican...

>> theres a question, is it all smushed together or not. thats what theyre trying to determine. thank you. the presidents morning tweets a stark contrast from thursdays tweeting hiatus during testimony of james comey. the president continues to rely on the social immediate media tool as a pathway between the thoughts and his world, but causing major concern for his closest advisers because its memorializing some of his most controversial comments. msnbcs savannah sellers is here to walk us thr...

Mike, help us with security because thats where elections are run on the state level? >> yeah, thats a good question. yes, we do look at issues of credibility. we look at issues of security, of systems. were seeing more of that being, you know, asked -- primarily the commercial side. we dont get a lot from the government side. its a great deal of concern now as there should be over the impact of outside state sponsored or individual or just, you know, hacking groups attacks on systems. whether t...

Think to most people some question about whether the president meant when he was repeatedly imploring the head of the fbi to do things like provide loyalty and see his way to getting clear of the russia thing and getting the russian cloud over -- off his head. all of those things obviously can be taken as attempts to try to enterfear -- interfere with the investigation. that said, you have to remember that obstruction of justice cases turn heavily on intent and so the republican side, the trump ...

By the president of the united states where there are multiple people who say they had unorthodox conversations with the president where they felt it was inappropriate, that the president was contacting them one-on-one. >> jonathan, youre reading my notes here. i was going to get to that next. react to what jonathan said that. preet bharara here will he be brought in by the special counsel? bob mueller is saying, okay, help me put this story together and its clear that preet bharara believes tha...