Science Aside News Today

Was manipulated, search results or votes themselves. what he says, and this is disputed, is that googles search results showed bias during the 2016 -- >> meaning what? >> what he says is he got a bunch of people, basically random americans to google various election related things and he says that the first page of the google results were more pro-clinton on google than other websites. there are a lot of questions about the methodology i can get into. >> science aside, nobody believes polling is...

Hes a clinton supporter, that part is correct. there are various questions about the quality of the study but even the studys author says that the president didnt describe the study correctly. what the studys author says is he has no evidence that anything was manipulated, search results or votes themselves. what he says, and this is disputed, is that googles search results showed bias during the 2016 -- >> meaning what? >> what he says is he got a bunch of people, basically random americans to ...