Page 16 - Second Amendment Case News Today

Refugees is a clear victory for our national security. the high court set to take up the case in the fall. involves six countries. until then, the president gets his way mostly. we have fox team coverage. brit hume tells us what it means. kristin fisher at the white house. first up, doug mckelway outside the supreme court this evening. >> the supreme court handed the trump administration a big victory over the much debated travel ban today, also a bit of a victory of religious freedom. speculati...

Saying it was mr. trump who encouraged russia to find hillary clintons missing emails. sean spicer said the president was clearly joking. >> bill: kristin fisher on the north lawn. lets find out what this means with brit hume. >> thats a tall order, what it all means. i will do my best. looking at this decision on what has been called a travel ban, a couple things to remember. they are going to hear the case in full involved so its conceivable the ruling could go a different way from today but u...

President about russia, cnn special report. the russia connection inside the attack on democracy. that is tomorrow night 10:00 pm eastern here on cnn. a lot ahead for us this hour. decision on the presidents travel ban could be moments away. decision on whether or not the supreme court will take up that case. will get an answer in moments. and passengers saying like it was like being in a washing machine 30,000 feet up. the flight so terrifying the pilot told everyone to pray. washington battl...

Libya temporarily goes into effect. >> huge victory from the white house. this case will be argued on the merits the first week of octobe october. decision some time and may be december or january. whatever they say will closely model what they said here. >> the ruling exempt foreign nationals who are college students, workers recruited by u.s. firms or those who have blood relatives here. the administration says it will take effect in 72 hours. the high courts decision was greeted with stark pa...

Into two classes. one is people have a clear connection to the united states either through blood relative or because they have a job waiting for them or they are enrolled in school. that is a relatively small group. everyone else, people with no such connection to the united states, is now in a situation where they can be blocked from coming in. that is nearly everybody. the people you would be worried about are the people who have no connection to the eyed states. this is a pretty complete win...

If were going to intervene if a conflict, it better pose a direct threat to our interests that most americans will know where the hot spot is on the globe and will quickly understand why were getting involved. the threat should be so direct that our leaders should be able to make the case clearly and concisely and goes on to write, at the same time, we must not get involved in a long festering conflict for humanitarian reasons. does this appear to reach then citizen trumps thresholds? >> were se...

Right. it says that. i was quoting buckley, im sure, our citing buckley to that effect. the question is what level of scrutiny should we apply to that case. buckley suggests its something less than strict scrutiny in the first amendment context for contributions. thats the instruction that i as lower court judge have in the first amendment context this. an equal protection challenge. its not just contributions. its the inequality of contributions thats the problem here. that this system favors m...

Better than writing a dissent to your own opinion, but you wrote a concurrence to your opinion. to me, this move, if, as you imply in your concurrent -- you dont imply. you say, it could have titanic real world implications when it comes to our 13500 casesos on the book since 1948. in your book you say you dont overturn precedent unless it is universally accepted affirmed by courts repeatedly and people have extensive reliance on the decision. my question is why you are concurring -- senator fei...

Latest updates on this topic.

You apply the normal strict scrutiny. and i pointed to two wonderful pins by judges in the area -- >> okay. all right. i really did read it. heres the -- okay. i understand that. heres the deal. the other judges were happy to decide it on the narrow basis. you write the concurring opinion to bring up this other issue. i think again about justice white, who is your mentor or was your boss and, there is a law review article from the dean of tulane time and time again justice white avoided broad th...