possession was classified and he knew that designation limited his ability to share it, which would undercut the defense his lawyers have presented in the ongoing special counsel probe of his handling of classified documents. paula reid helped break this story. a couple of key questions to begin with. what exactly did he say? i m curious how prosecutors got this tape. let s take the second question first. this is not a seek red recording. in the summer of 2021 the former president was in the habit of having his aides record any conversations with journalists, writers, people working on books. so in this meeting were two people working on an autobiography for former chief of staff mark meadows. meadows was not in the room but that was one of the ways that it was recorded. it is unclear whether they got it from the investigators or the aides. or from the cloud. these files were upencloloaded.
point 5% said rates would. and the other point 5% at said rates would. and the other point 5% at the end of this year and 1% point 5% at the end of this year and t% at point 5% at the end of this year and t% at the point 5% at the end of this year and 1% at the end of the two year forecast~ 1% at the end of the two year forecast. do we need to do more or less on forecast. do we need to do more or less on rates? can forecast. do we need to do more or less on rates? forecast. do we need to do more or less on rates? can i take the second ruestion less on rates? can i take the second question first? less on rates? can i take the second question first? i less on rates? can i take the second question first? i think less on rates? can i take the second question first? i think it less on rates? can i take the second question first? i think it is less on rates? can i take the second question first? i think it is a - less on rates? can i take the second question first? i thi
congressman george santos clearly undeterred by the ongoing federal, state and local investigations against him or the calls for him to resign confirms he is running for re-election. in a tweet, the freshman republican says his decision to run again is about restoring greatness back to new york but he s already got a primary challenger and a noncommittal response from party leadership when asked if he favors a santos run, speaker kevin mccarthy laughed and said, quote, we ll wait and see who else files. nbc s ryan nobles is on capitol hill jonathan lemire is back with us. ryan, i ll go out on a limb and say it is not a good sign when party leadership is reluctant to support you for re-election. what more are you hearing and, by the way, do we have an update on the ethics investigation against santos well, to answer your second question first, chris, no, we don t have an update on the ethics investigation, and that
60-vote requirement. meaning republicans will have to get on board to support this replacement. now, if that happens and if republicans are not apt to help out democrats with this replacement, that is when we may see more democrats call for feinstein to resign and to bring someone new into the senate. because that would mean senate business continues to be held up i was just going to say, if she can t be replaced, you can t get those judicial nominees confirmed, and the pressure does mount on democrats what are you hearing from feinstein s defenders on the hill are they saying she s going to stick around is she going to fight this also, do we have any sense of when she could come back to take the second question first, no, there s no sense of when she will return the senate reconvenes after a two-week recess next week. senator feinstein said she hopes to return to the senate as soon as possible. she said her initial, anticipated return of march has been delayed because of complicat
i don t think we learned that from the indictment and then secondly, why would brag not put everything on the table? why wouldn t you tell us? what makes these felonies so i m going to start with the second question first. it s funny when i read this. i feel he did tell us. tell us told us that the participants violated election laws and that they mischaracterized these payments for tax purposes. and that tells us everything we need to know about what the crimes are. what the criminal intent was because alvin bragg doesn t have to prove which crime at the end of the day. the crime doesn t even have to be committed or started or intended intended, and that they meaning they meant to commit a crime or conceal a crime. and so i feel like he told us everything we needed to know in the statement of facts, can i jump in? because i think the crux of it. i was saying to poppy earlier, i said, i said, i believe they are telling us, especially on page seven, where he talks about the four $120,00